Ubuntu 18.04 Versus Six Other Linux Distributions On AMD EPYC

Written by Michael Larabel in Operating Systems on 15 March 2018 at 07:00 AM EDT. Page 4 of 4. 12 Comments.
Ubuntu 18.04 vs. Other Linux Distros On AMD EPYC

As well as with FFmpeg video encoding, Clear Linux was the fastest followed by Fedora Workstation 27 while Manjaro 17.1.6 was notably slower than the rest.

Ubuntu 18.04 vs. Other Linux Distros On AMD EPYC
Ubuntu 18.04 vs. Other Linux Distros On AMD EPYC

With the Redis server performance, Clear Linux dominates as we have seen happen on other systems too where it's delivering much speedier results for this NoSQL platform.

Ubuntu 18.04 vs. Other Linux Distros On AMD EPYC

Complementing the Numpy results from earlier is also the Python PyBench. Clear Linux again was the fastest here followed by Manjaro and then the others.

Ubuntu 18.04 vs. Other Linux Distros On AMD EPYC

Clear Linux also yielded the fastest performance for the PHP language benchmark while Ubuntu 16.04 LTS with its older PHP release was much slower than the other tested operating systems.

Of the 33 benchmarks ran on this AMD EPYC 7551 + Gigabyte system backed by Samsung 960 EVO SSD storage, Clear Linux 21260 came in first place 20 of the times followed by Ubuntu 16.04 LTS six of the times and then the new Ubuntu 18.04 LTS won three times. The rest of the distributions each won once as tested in their default / out-of-the-box / factory configuration. When it came to losses, Manjaro 17.1.6 was losing most often with finishing in last 10 times and then Debian Testing with seven finishes in last and Debian Testing with six losses.

As the Ubuntu 18.04 LTS release approaches at the end of April, a greater variety of tests on different systems with different test focuses will be carried out on Phoronix. In general, not just about the data in this article, Ubuntu 18.04 LTS is doing better than Ubuntu 16.04 LTS performance-wise particularly for the updated open-source graphics driver support (obviously), the overall system performance can be faster depending upon the hardware, and newer hardware especially favors the Bionic Beaver due to the newer kernel and compiler.

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal or Stripe tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.


Related Articles
About The Author
Michael Larabel

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter, LinkedIn, or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.