Ubuntu 16.10 Desktop Gaming Benchmarks: Unity, GNOME, Xfce, LXDE, KDE, Openbox, MATE

Written by Michael Larabel in Operating Systems on 18 October 2016 at 04:00 PM EDT. Page 4 of 4. 44 Comments.
Ubuntu 16.10 Desktops

MATE and Xfce remained slower than the other desktops while running Counter-Strike: Global Offensive on Steam while GNOME ran into a weird performance slowdown for this Valve game.

Ubuntu 16.10 Desktops

With Dota 2, however, the performance was closer between the desktops while Xfce and MATE were a tiny bit slower in this case.

For the most part, the performance between LXDE, GNOME, Openbox, and KDE Plasma tended to be about the same on Ubuntu 16.10 when using the stock Intel Skylake graphics support. The desktops that tended to be the slowest were actually Xfce and MATE for Linux graphics/gaming, at least in the out-of-the-box configuration as packaged in Ubuntu Yakkety. What have your experiences been? If any premium members have other test requests or with other graphics driver options (e.g. RadeonSI), let me know!

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal or Stripe tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.

Related Articles
About The Author
Michael Larabel

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter, LinkedIn, or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.