Power Consumption & Thermal Testing With The Core i9 7900X On Linux

Written by Michael Larabel in Processors on 29 June 2017 at 10:50 AM EDT. Page 3 of 6. 19 Comments.
Core i7 7700K vs. Ryzen 7 1800X vs. Core i9 7900X Linux Power + Thermal

Next up was a run of PostgreSQL, where the 20 thread Core i9 7900X came out well in front of the other tested CPUs.

Core i7 7700K vs. Ryzen 7 1800X vs. Core i9 7900X Linux Power + Thermal

Air cooling was sufficient for all of the tested CPUs while the i7-7700K strangely peaked higher than the i9-7900X.

Core i7 7700K vs. Ryzen 7 1800X vs. Core i9 7900X Linux Power + Thermal

The Core i9 7900X had a average power draw of 110 Watts and a peak of 141 Watts while running PostgreSQL compared to the Ryzen 7 1800X at 97 / 124 Watts and the i7-7700K at 69 / 91 Watts.

Core i7 7700K vs. Ryzen 7 1800X vs. Core i9 7900X Linux Power + Thermal

But the higher power use of the Skylake-X was still enough to give it leading performance-per-Watt with this being one of the multi-threaded tests.

Core i7 7700K vs. Ryzen 7 1800X vs. Core i9 7900X Linux Power + Thermal

With the Apache web server test, the i9-7900X actually loses out to the i7-7700K.

Core i7 7700K vs. Ryzen 7 1800X vs. Core i9 7900X Linux Power + Thermal

Air cooling is still working out for the i9-7900X with the i11 and NH-D9L.

Core i7 7700K vs. Ryzen 7 1800X vs. Core i9 7900X Linux Power + Thermal
Core i7 7700K vs. Ryzen 7 1800X vs. Core i9 7900X Linux Power + Thermal

For this self-hosting Apache test, the power use of the i9-7900X was only a few Watts more than the other CPUs.


Related Articles