EXT4, Btrfs, XFS & NILFS2 HDD File-System Tests On Linux 4.8

Written by Michael Larabel in Storage on 24 August 2016 at 12:03 PM EDT. Page 3 of 3. 7 Comments.

NILFS2 came back to the top position with the FS_Mark tests followed by XFS.

EXT4 took the lead for Compile Bench...

With the fsync-happy PostMark test, Btrfs and EXT4 were neck-and-neck.

With the PostgreSQL database benchmark the leader was EXT4 followed by XFS and Btrfs.

Well, nothing really as a surprise from this hard drive testing with Linux 4.8... Overall, EXT4 and XFS tended to perform the strongest as they tend to regardless of storage medium while Btrfs and NILFS2 still had their strong finishes. Again, this was with just out-of-the-box testing and using the default mount options for each file-system from this lone Hitachi HUA72302 hard drive. If you wish to see how your own Linux system(s) disk performance compares, simply install the Phoronix Test Suite and run phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1608243-LO-HDDDISKTE91.

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal or Stripe tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.


Related Articles
About The Author
Michael Larabel

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter, LinkedIn, or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.