Attempting To Try Out BCache On The Linux 4.1 Kernel
Written by Michael Larabel in Storage on 25 June 2015. Page 3 of 3. 12 Comments

I'm still investigating these results. The reason for this preliminary article is a shout-out so if anyone has any insight to share on the Bcache results, that would be interesting to see in the forums. From these mostly synthetic disk benchmarks at least, the BCache cache didn't actually serve much good on this particular setup. Bad hardware combination? Bad defaults? Do the tests need to wear in for much longer than a few times before the cache becomes useful? Regression in Linux ~4.1? I'm happy to run more tests so stay tuned for updates on this investigation into BCache.

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.


Related Articles
About The Author
Author picture

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.

Trending Linux News