Running FreeBSD 12, TrueOS On AMD EPYC
Written by Michael Larabel in Operating Systems on 27 August 2017. Page 2 of 2. 10 Comments

With TrueOS and upstream FreeBSD supporting ZFS well, in some I/O tests it does continue to compete with or even outperform the tier-one Linux distributions.

The Assembly-written asmFish chess engine was faster on the Linux distributions over the FreeBSD 12 based TrueOS.

OpenSUSE Tumbleweed was the fastest at building out the LLVM compiler stack while TrueOS / FreeBSD were the slowest with the exception of Clear Linux running in between them. Clear's slower compile times are due to its aggressive CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS to enhance the performance of compiled binaries albeit at the expensive of slower compile times.

While the C-Ray multi-threaded ray-tracer was the fastest on Clear Linux, due to that Intel distribution's aggressive performance optimizations.

The Linux distributions were slightly faster than FreeBSD 12-CURRENT / TrueOS at LAME MP3 encoding, with Clear Linux again taking the lead.

The Linux distributions were faster than the FreeBSD-based operating systems with their Python performance measured by PyBench.

Clear Linux and Ubuntu 18.04 LTS were also a fair amount faster than PHP 7.1 as tested on FreeBSD 12-CURRENT.

If you are interested in any other AMD EPYC BSD tests or other niche system tests with EPYC, feel free to post your requests in our forums.


About The Author
Author picture

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 10,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.


Related Articles
Trending Linux News