Btrfs File-System For Old Computers?
Written by Michael Larabel in Software on 3 October 2011. Page 4 of 4. 22 Comments

Running Dbench with six clients was clearly faster than EXT4 with all of the tested mount options. Btrfs compression was of little benefit for this test from the Intel Core Duo notebook.

The IOzone results were not too interesting between EXT4 and Btrfs, or with most of the mount options, except when enabling compression for this 2GB write test.

The IOzone 2GB read test was similar to the write results, with Btrfs and EXT4 being close to the same speed, except the ability for Btrfs to provide transparent compression support continues to be a great advantage.

More tests (and from an older Pentium M notebook) will come after Oktoberfest with looking at the CPU usage and other metrics.

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.


Related Articles
About The Author
Author picture

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.

Trending Linux News