NVIDIA GH200 CPU Performance Benchmarks Against AMD EPYC Zen 4 & Intel Xeon Emerald Rapids

Written by Michael Larabel in Processors on 8 February 2024 at 01:00 PM EST. Page 4 of 5. 90 Comments.
Timed Godot Game Engine Compilation benchmark with settings of Time To Compile. EPYC 9684X 2P was the fastest.
Primesieve benchmark with settings of Length: 1e13. EPYC 9754 2P was the fastest.
Helsing benchmark with settings of Digit Range: 14 digit. EPYC 9754 2P was the fastest.

Overall the CPU performance of the GPTshop.ai GH200 system was quite competitive on the CPU side and exceeded my expectations. The 72 core Neoverse-V2 configuration paired with HBM memory proved quite capable for a wide array of CPU workloads... Of course it will be all the more interesting when firing up the workloads also able to leverage the H100 GPU of this superchip design.

Graph500 benchmark with settings of Scale: 26. EPYC 9754 2P was the fastest.
Graph500 benchmark with settings of Scale: 26. EPYC 9754 2P was the fastest.

The NVIDIA GH200 was also delivering much greater performance than what is available with the Ampere Altra Max 128-core processor, though will be interesting to see how AmpereOne compares once finally having hardware access.


Related Articles
Intel Announces Gaudi 3 AI Accelerator, Intel Xeon 6 Brand
AMD Zen 4 vs. Zen 4C Performance, Zen 4C Core Scaling With Ryzen 5 8500G
Intel Core i3 14100 / i5 14500 vs. AMD Ryzen 5 8500G / 8600G In 500+ Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 8500G / 8600G / 8700G Performance @ 35 Watt & 45 Watt cTDP
AMD Ryzen 5 8500G: A Surprisingly Fascinating Sub-$200 CPU
AMD Ryzen 5 8600G Linux Performance