AMDGPU/RadeonSI Linux 4.10 + Mesa 17.1-dev vs. NVIDIA 378.09 Performance

Written by Michael Larabel in Display Drivers on 27 January 2017 at 08:39 AM EST. Page 5 of 5. 68 Comments.
Steam Linux Testing

The Tesseract performance for this open-source first person shooter.

Steam Linux Testing

With Unigine Heaven the RX 480 and R9 Fury are currently performing ahead of the GTX 1050 Ti but behind a GTX 980.

Steam Linux Testing

With the Xonotic first person shooter, the AMDGPU+RadeonSI stack continues running well for this particular game.

Those are the latest numbers I have for AMDGPU+RadeonSI as of this week, compared to the latest NVIDIA beta Linux driver. Coming up next are some initial AMDGPU-PRO 16.60 benchmarks for this just-released hybrid driver update.

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal or Stripe tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.

Related Articles
RADV vs. AMDVLK Radeon Vulkan Ray-Tracing Performance For Mid-2024
AMD vs. NVIDIA Vulkan Ray-Tracing Performance On Linux With Breaking Limit
NVIDIA R550 Linux Driver's Open Kernel Modules Performing Well On GeForce GPUs
AMD Quietly Funded A Drop-In CUDA Implementation Built On ROCm: It's Now Open-Source
Trying Out & Benchmarking The New Experimental Intel Xe Linux Graphics Driver
Intel's Open-Source Compute Runtime Performing Increasingly Well Against NVIDIA's Proprietary Linux Driver
About The Author
Michael Larabel

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter, LinkedIn, or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.