F2FS File-System Runs Great On SDHC Storage

Written by Michael Larabel in Software on 21 February 2013 at 02:38 PM EST. Page 3 of 3. 10 Comments.

In nearly all of the tests (except for the large IOzone write tests), the F2FS file-system was either running at the same speed as EXT4 or faster. Btrfs generally was the worst performer on the SDHC storage medium. The next Flash-Friendly File-System benchmarks will take place on USB flash storage.

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal or Stripe tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.

Related Articles
AmpereOne Performance With GCC vs. LLVM Clang Compilers
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X vs. Ryzen 9 7950X/7950X3D For Workstation Graphics
AMD Zen 5 Not Affected By Inception/SRSO, mitigations=off Yields No Benefit On Ryzen 9000 Series
AmpereOne Performance On Linux 6.11 Kernel, 4K vs. 64K Page Size Comparison
AMD Ryzen 9 9950X Power/Performance With CPU Frequency Scaling Driver Tunables
Linux 6.11 Kernel Features Deliver A Lot For New/Upcoming Intel & AMD Hardware
About The Author
Michael Larabel

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter, LinkedIn, or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.