AMD Fusion On Gallium3D Leaves A Lot To Be Desired

Written by Michael Larabel in Display Drivers on 16 April 2012 at 02:00 AM EDT. Page 5 of 6. 25 Comments.

In all tests across the board from 2D to 3D, the Catalyst Linux driver was the definite performance winner compared to the open-source Radeon Gallium3D stack for the A8-3870K with Radeon HD 6550D graphics. But perhaps the open-source driver is more power efficient? Not quite.

AMD A8 Fusion APU Linux Catalyst Gallium3D

When looking at the power consumption when running OpenArena, the A8-3870K system was going through 78 Watts when running the Catalyst driver while it was only 64 Watts with the open-source stack. However, if looking at the per-Watt efficiency of the Gallium3D driver, it is very disappointing:

AMD A8 Fusion APU Linux Catalyst Gallium3D

While the power consumption was lower with the Gallium3D driver, on a per-Watt basis the Catalyst driver is 4.68x more efficient than the open-source code.

AMD A8 Fusion APU Linux Catalyst Gallium3D
AMD A8 Fusion APU Linux Catalyst Gallium3D

The newer OpenArena 0.8.8 had similar results: the Gallium3D driver was going through 20 Watts less except the performance-per-Watt power efficiency when using Catalyst was 80% better.


Related Articles