Mesa 9.1 Results Are Mixed For Radeon Gallium3D

Written by Michael Larabel in Display Drivers on 6 February 2013 at 11:59 AM EST. Page 5 of 5. 36 Comments.

A look at the VDrift frame-rate performance in real-time doesn't reveal anything too exciting for tests in this case.

Xonotic is noticeably slower than earlier Mesa releases at resolutions above 800 x 600.

If you missed it, also check out the Radeon DRM GPU Driver Performance From Linux 3.4 to Linux 3.8, at least there are some nice performance improvements when upgrading to the soon-to-be-released Linux 3.8 kernel.

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal or Stripe tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.


Related Articles
AMD Quietly Funded A Drop-In CUDA Implementation Built On ROCm: It's Now Open-Source
Trying Out & Benchmarking The New Experimental Intel Xe Linux Graphics Driver
Intel's Open-Source Compute Runtime Performing Increasingly Well Against NVIDIA's Proprietary Linux Driver
Intel Arc Graphics See Faster Performance On Ubuntu 23.10
Raspberry Pi 5 Graphics Continue With Open-Source Driver & Crazy Fast Compared To RPi 4
Initial Benchmarks Of The "NVK" Open-Source NVIDIA Vulkan Driver
About The Author
Michael Larabel

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter, LinkedIn, or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.