Intel Xeon Platinum 8592+ "Emerald Rapids" Linux Benchmarks

Written by Michael Larabel in Processors on 14 December 2023 at 10:00 AM EST. Page 3 of 10. 26 Comments.

miniBUDE benchmark with settings of Implementation: OpenMP, Input Deck: BM2. EPYC 9654 2P - Power was the fastest.

Algebraic Multi-Grid Benchmark benchmark with settings of . EPYC 9684X 2P - Power was the fastest.

libxsmm benchmark with settings of M N K: 128. EPYC 9684X 2P - Power was the fastest.

libxsmm benchmark with settings of M N K: 256. EPYC 9684X 2P - Power was the fastest.

NWChem benchmark with settings of Input: C240 Buckyball. EPYC 9554 2P was the fastest.

The generational uplift from Sapphire Rapids to Emerald Rapids exceeded expectations but the AMD EPYC line-up with Genoa-X for 3D V-Cache processors and up to 96 cores for Genoa or 128 cores with Bergamo proved more advantageous in a number of the benchmarks.

Xcompact3d Incompact3d benchmark with settings of Input: X3D-benchmarking input.i3d. Xeon Platinum 8592+ 2P was the fastest.

The Xeon Platinum 8592+ 2P did deliver the best performance of the tested processors for the Xcompact3D/Incompact3D software.

OpenRadioss benchmark with settings of Model: Chrysler Neon 1M. EPYC 9684X 2P - Power was the fastest.

For Altair's OpenRadioss the Xeon Platinum 8592+ performance was matching the EPYC 9554 2P performance and even the EPYC 9654 in the 1P race.

LULESH benchmark with settings of . Xeon Platinum 8592+ 2P was the fastest.

The Xeon Platinum 8592+ had a strong first place finish with the LULESH hydrodynamics software but trailed EPYC Siena processors for the best performance-per-Watt.

26 Comments - Next Page

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next Page