AMD EPYC 8324P / 8324PN Siena 32-Core Siena Linux Server Performance

Written by Michael Larabel in Processors on 10 October 2023 at 08:00 PM EDT. Page 9 of 9. 5 Comments.
7-Zip Compression benchmark with settings of Test: Compression Rating. EPYC 8324PN - Power was the fastest.
7-Zip Compression benchmark with settings of Test: Decompression Rating. EPYC 8324PN - Power was the fastest.
Liquid-DSP benchmark with settings of Threads: 64, Buffer Length: 256, Filter Length: 32. EPYC 8324P - Power was the fastest.

Overall it was quite interesting to see the EPYC 8324P/8324PN with thirty-two Zen 4C cores still competing -- and at times outperforming in raw performance -- the Xeon Gold 6421N Sapphire Rapids processor that costs more and was also less power efficient. Genoa(X) and Bergamo have already proved plenty capable of outperforming Sapphire Rapids but with EPYC Siena before for cost and energy efficiency minded products, it was impressive to see Siena delivering a trifecta of competitiveness against Intel's latest wares.

Geometric Mean Of All Test Results benchmark with settings of Result Composite, AMD EPYC 8324P 8324PN Siena Benchmarks. EPYC 8324P - Power was the fastest.

The EPYC 8324P/8324PN proved robust in their offerings and for those wishing to maximize the value even more can make use of the EPYC power determinism mode.

CPU Power Consumption Monitor benchmark with settings of Phoronix Test Suite System Monitoring.

Even in power determinism mode the EPYC 8324P consumed significantly less power than the Xeon Gold 6421N competition... Across all of the benchmarks carried out the EPYC 8324P on average had a 89 Watt average with a 136 Watt peak, or in power determinism mode a 94 Watt average with a 168 Watt peak. Meanwhile the Xeon Gold 6421N had a 139 Watt average and 192 Watt peak. On average the Xeon Gold 6421N power consumption was 1.56x that of the stock EPYC 8324P or 1.93x of the EPYC 8324PN.

AMD Cinnabar Server

At least from looking at the EPYC 8324P and 8324PN processors so far up against the equivalent Xeon Gold 6421N 32-core Sapphire Rapids processor, EPYC Siena is on track to deliver a compelling trifecta of performance, value, and energy efficiency for those looking at single socket servers and not needing to maximize the core count or density where Genoa and Bergamo come into play or for really driving HPC workloads where Genoa-X is able to deliver stunning results. With Siena, AMD really is now able to deliver a well-rounded server portfolio with Zen 4(C) in the eight to sixty-four core space and opening them up to new markets with the NEBS-friendly "PN" SKUs. The versatility of Siena is also coming out via various interesting ODM platform designs largely catering to TCO value and/or maximizing power efficiency.

Thanks to AMD for providing the EPYC Siena samples for this round of benchmarking. Coming up shortly will be a look at the 64-core EPYC Siena server performance at the top-end.

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal or Stripe tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.


Related Articles
About The Author
Michael Larabel

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter, LinkedIn, or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.