AMD EPYC 9754 Benchmarks For The 128-Core Bergamo

Written by Michael Larabel in Processors on 19 July 2023 at 09:00 AM EDT. Page 6 of 9. 31 Comments.
LuxCoreRender benchmark with settings of Scene: DLSC, Acceleration: CPU. EPYC 9754 2P was the fastest.
LuxCoreRender benchmark with settings of Scene: Orange Juice, Acceleration: CPU. EPYC 9754 2P - Power 400W was the fastest.
LuxCoreRender benchmark with settings of Scene: Orange Juice, Acceleration: CPU. EPYC 9754 2P - Power 400W was the fastest.
LuxCoreRender benchmark with settings of Scene: Orange Juice, Acceleration: CPU. EPYC 9754 2P - Power 400W was the fastest.

The LuxCoreRender open-source physically-based renderer was also enjoying the higher core counts available with Bergamo. I was quite surprised at how much better Bergamo was for power efficiency compared to Genoa that is already delivering great power efficiency and typically well ahead of Xeon Sapphire Rapids.

OSPRay Studio benchmark with settings of Camera: 1, Resolution: 1080p, Samples Per Pixel: 1, Renderer: Path Tracer. EPYC 9754 2P - Power 400W was the fastest.
OSPRay Studio benchmark with settings of Camera: 1, Resolution: 1080p, Samples Per Pixel: 16, Renderer: Path Tracer. EPYC 9754 2P - Power 400W was the fastest.
OSPRay Studio benchmark with settings of Camera: 1, Resolution: 4K, Samples Per Pixel: 1, Renderer: Path Tracer. EPYC 9754 2P - Power 400W was the fastest.
OSPRay Studio benchmark with settings of Camera: 3, Resolution: 4K, Samples Per Pixel: 32, Renderer: Path Tracer. EPYC 9754 2P - Power 400W was the fastest.

Even with some of Intel's own creator software packages like OSPRay Studio, the AMD EPYC 9754 2P server configuration was performing excellent and continuing to propel AMD server performance forward.


Related Articles