Originally posted by rohcQaH
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Debian Still Debating Systemd vs. Upstart Init System
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by moonwalker View PostI've been using systemd on Debian in form of systemd-sysv package that completely replaces sysvinit package. There were some issues in earlier versions some year or two ago and a brief period where my system was for whatever reason booting actually a bit slower than before conversion, but right now on my Debian Sid desktop setup what takes the most time during boot is actually me entering 13-symbols-long LUKS password.
Comment
-
Originally posted by busukxuan View Post[Offtopic]
No offense, but that was kinda sexist.
[/Offtopic]
Comment
-
Originally posted by BeardedGNUFreak View PostLOL!
I would love to see the reaction from the BSD devs that someone was porting the GIGANTIC STINKING PILE OF FAIL that is systemd to BSD.
Since BSD folks already started adopting launchd, the ORIGINAL GIGANTIC STINKING PILE OF FAIL, I don't get your argument at all.
Comment
-
Originally posted by brosis View PostWhy do you "resonate" with sexism? It is of same value, as your nickname containing "bus" and all buses are polluters, so as I've had asked to remove "bus" from your nickname, because your nickname offends environment. These are nice shortcuts to allergies, illnesses, lose of taste and life essence.
Comment
-
there should be a third option the multiplataform is very important
i really don't trust in red hat or cannonical, red hat just wants beta testers and cannonical just cares about the smartphones
Debian should drop support to gnome and use lxde or xfce, because gnome 3 "depends" of systemd.
Comment
-
Originally posted by erendorn View PostJust stop. Your initial post was indeed overtly sexist, now this is just senseless gibberish.
Comment
-
Originally posted by brosis View PostSorry, I have a penis. And my son does. What do you want me to have instead? Women also have more estrogen than testosterone, hence they act soft/yin/shadow, hence it is called woman approach without relation to any concrete female individual, and this approach is worse in some situation exactly as its better in others. Sexism is a backside of chauvinism, they are both ill mind states. Ask Dalai Lama, he knows more.
Comment
-
Originally posted by brosis View PostSorry, I have a penis. And my son does. What do you want me to have instead? Women also have more estrogen than testosterone, hence they act soft/yin/shadow, hence it is called woman approach without relation to any concrete female individual, and this approach is worse in some situation exactly as its better in others. Sexism is a backside of chauvinism, they are both ill mind states. Ask Dalai Lama, he knows more.
Life tip: if you want to describe a soft approach, use soft. Do not use an arbitrary group in which an unknown proportion of individuals act using said approach. This applies for any group (with the exception of the "soft approaching people" group), and to any characteristic.
Comment
Comment