Why is Ubuntu so slow? Userland? Kernel config? Or what?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
macOS 10.13 vs. Windows 10 vs. Clear/Fedora/openSUSE/Ubuntu Linux Benchmarks
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Weasel View PostWhy is Ubuntu so slow? Userland? Kernel config? Or what?
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Charlie68 View PostI'm not a big fan of benchmarks, they often offer a distorted view of the reality that the user then finds. However I am always curious ... and I am quite satisfied with the decent behavior of Tumbleweed in the benchmarks.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
It is open-source on GitHub.... If you search on Phoronix.com, you can find Clear Linux benchmarks already on Ryzen CPUs..
Comment
-
Is it just me or has Mac been doing a lot better in benchmarks? I thought from previous benchmarks Mac lost in almost every test, but maybe I'm remembering wrong.
Originally posted by euler271 View PostIt's sad that you didnt test with Arch. The fact that 'Arch' didnt work when you tested with manjaro and Antergos only says what we already knew.
Arch for noobs = Antergos/Manjaro is an oxymoron and shouldnt exist at all.
If I were Michael, I wouldn't test using Arch either, for the same reason he doesn't test Gentoo - it takes too much time and effort to get it set up. One of the perks of Arch is being able to use a simple install script for quick and easy (re-)deployment, but that still takes a lot more effort than I think he really cares to put into it.
- Likes 4
Comment
-
I would like to see more Solus vs Clear Linux in benchmarks, 'cause Solus actually uses quite a few Clear Linux optimizations and whatnot (I am a Solus user myself, but still, I'd like to see more of how it compares to Clear Linux in terms of benchmarks)
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pawlerson View PostWhile it's not surprising macOS and Windows aren't performance demons, Ubuntu should change kernel configuration. It's far from being optimal.
Comment
-
Comment