Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

macOS 10.13 vs. Windows 10 vs. Clear/Fedora/openSUSE/Ubuntu Linux Benchmarks

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • macOS 10.13 vs. Windows 10 vs. Clear/Fedora/openSUSE/Ubuntu Linux Benchmarks

    Phoronix: macOS 10.13 vs. Windows 10 vs. Clear/Fedora/openSUSE/Ubuntu Linux Benchmarks

    When running tests this week on a MacBook Pro for the Dota 2 Vulkan/OpenGL cross-OS performance I also took the opportunity as part of the fun benchmarking week for celebrating the Phoronix 14th birthday by running a broader set of system benchmarks across the latest macOS 10.13 High Sierra, Windows 10 Pro, and various Linux distributions. Here are those CPU/system performance benchmark results.

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    That color for the macOS bar... At least the text should be black.

    Also I don't like how the real Ubuntu 18.04 is slower than its WSL version. It will give Windows users a false impression of how the OS really performs... no X264
    Last edited by tildearrow; 06 June 2018, 04:18 PM.

    Comment


    • #3
      Clear linux again leading the way. Is this distro completly open source? I hope they will also work on optimising ryzen cpu ^^

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Jahimself View Post
        Clear linux again leading the way. Is this distro completly open source? I hope they will also work on optimising ryzen cpu ^^
        It is open-source on GitHub.... If you search on Phoronix.com, you can find Clear Linux benchmarks already on Ryzen CPUs...
        Michael Larabel
        https://www.michaellarabel.com/

        Comment


        • #5
          Fedora is really fast too..

          Comment


          • #6
            While it's not surprising macOS and Windows aren't performance demons, Ubuntu should change kernel configuration. It's far from being optimal.

            Comment


            • #7
              The GraphicsMagick performance was the slowest on macOS due to their default Xcode compiler stack relying upon LLVM/Clang that supports OpenMP these days but still isn't as well tuned as OpenMP on GCC.
              Not sure if that is actually true. Last year, I switched to vanilla LLVM since Apple's fork had OpenMP disabled.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Jahimself View Post
                Clear linux again leading the way. Is this distro completly open source? I hope they will also work on optimising ryzen cpu ^^
                This distribution is directly from Intel.... quess what they will not do...

                Comment


                • #9
                  I'm really impressed by fedoras performance. Given that it uses selinux, I remember it to be slower than ubuntu. It's my prefered desktop system for a couple of years now and it's getting better and better

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I'm not a big fan of benchmarks, they often offer a distorted view of the reality that the user then finds. However I am always curious ... and I am quite satisfied with the decent behavior of Tumbleweed in the benchmarks.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X