Originally posted by guzz46
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
GNOME Publishes Draft Of Five-Year Strategic Plan
Collapse
X
-
-
DEI? Really?
Originally posted by Volta View Post
What do they mean here? What about less diverse people?
Wonder who the crazy bastard is that thought tying (text) selection to the primary clipboard was a good idea, now if users do shenanigans to disable primary clipboard pasting, selection doesn't work in almost any gtk application. Absolute trash.Last edited by rabcor; 23 May 2024, 05:39 PM.
- Likes 4
Comment
-
Running these through tac and adjusting the headlines makes them sensible:
"Strengthen & stabilize GNOME Foundation as nonprofit organization"
- Prioritize the health and well-being of the foundation itself
- Double the annual expense and revenue budget of the GNOME Foundation
- Claim and Document Our Impact and Value
"Create Unified, Integrated Suite of Programs, Services, & Processes"
- Reorganize our events into a streamlined, more inclusive annual event
- Strengthen critical weaknesses in IT infrastructure and security
- Consciously integrate our technologies and services
"Create Explosive Growth of Our Community of Creators and Users"
- Increase commercial and economic value of GNOME
- Relate to bigger “outward” world by making GNOME directly relevant and attractive to many more diverse people
- Unify our “inward” community around a shared vision
Simply put, they got their priorities backwards.
- Likes 9
Comment
-
Originally posted by oleid View Post
Racist? That's not the correct word in this context.
Treading all people equal is not what is good for everyone. In some cases equality and equity yield to the same results, i.e. for elections. Everybodys vote has the same weight. Yet, in many cases equality doesn't equate equity.
Some people need less support for the same outcome, others more. It is like giving everybody shoes of the same size 42 because that's the average shoe size. It might fit for some people, but not for everyone. There are even people without legs that don't have a need for shoes.
- Likes 12
Comment
-
I still don't understand why this foundation even exists... None of the things they said they will do actually matter to anyone outside the foundation, the foundation exists to please the foundation, tell me how this is not some elaborate money laundering scheme...
- Likes 8
Comment
-
Originally posted by oleid View Post
Racist? That's not the correct word in this context.
Treading all people equal is not what is good for everyone. In some cases equality and equity yield to the same results, i.e. for elections. Everybodys vote has the same weight. Yet, in many cases equality doesn't equate equity.
Some people need less support for the same outcome, others more. It is like giving everybody shoes of the same size 42 because that's the average shoe size. It might fit for some people, but not for everyone. There are even people without legs that don't have a need for shoes.
- Likes 13
Comment
-
Originally posted by mxan View PostWhen KDE set goals every few years, they're actually relevant to the project. When GNOME set goals, it's about Creators, Diversity, Economic Value. Corporate and soulless, just like Mozilla. I also love how they spell out what everyone's known about GNOME forever - that there are insiders ("inward community") and outsiders. They're not even hiding it anymore LOL
- Likes 6
Comment
-
Originally posted by oleid View Post
Racist? That's not the correct word in this context.
Treading all people equal is not what is good for everyone. In some cases equality and equity yield to the same results, i.e. for elections. Everybodys vote has the same weight. Yet, in many cases equality doesn't equate equity.
Some people need less support for the same outcome, others more. It is like giving everybody shoes of the same size 42 because that's the average shoe size. It might fit for some people, but not for everyone. There are even people without legs that don't have a need for shoes.
- Likes 5
Comment
-
Originally posted by quaz0r View Post
Your argument here, which you even provide a visualization of to make it extra clear, is essentially that an arbitrary difference like skin color is equivalent to the difference between an adult and a 2 year old. I couldn't think of anything more overtly racist if I tried.
- Likes 3
Comment
Comment