Originally posted by uid313
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
It's Time To Admit It: The X.Org Server Is Abandonware
Collapse
X
-
- Likes 13
-
Originally posted by skeevy420 View PostThe only problem is KDE Wayland isn't a very nice experience unless you're doing some crap like a video kiosk so I have next to no experience using it outside of trying it out and saying to myself "not yet".
- Likes 8
Comment
-
Originally posted by Awesomeness View Postand security-focused OpenBSD is apparently just fine working around X11 bugs instead of tackling the underlying cause.
I am also inclined to believe that once Wayland is used (i.e the stats suggest it really isn't yet https://linux-hardware.org/index.php...display_server) then the BSDs will already have good support. But we are probably talking 5-10 years time before that is even necessary. I even predict that something actually better than Wayland (and even Xorg) will come along and replace Wayland before it ever reaches mass adoption.
Wayland has been good though. It has shown us that things might one day change over time and even something as substantial as a display server may one day uproot. So portable code which is light on dependencies is good.Last edited by kpedersen; 25 October 2020, 06:57 AM.
- Likes 7
Comment
-
Originally posted by Awesomeness View PostFedora KDE is looking to switch to Wayland by default. openSUSE's Plasma Wayland session is that everything runs using XWayland and as a transitional step that was actually mostly fine (Klipper not working was the biggest flaw, IMO) but it's time to abandon that approach with 5.20 now being out.
Every time I run another distribution I think, "This is nice. I miss pacman."
- Likes 2
Comment
-
I'm only worried that many XWayland features are not getting released too due to the missing X.org releases. This is a big issue for games.
Regarding KDE I hope that they will will focus now on Wayland to get some of the fundamental issues and bugs solved.
- Likes 14
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sethox View PostI don't get the defending the Xorg argument. It's really outdated and it's literally standing on it's last legs as shown that no one wants to work with it. Only end-users will defend it's features. It's not a bad thing to have a "feature" complete project but if you defend Xorg then you cannot ignore it's technological side either or you fall into a cognitive dissonance situation.
- Likes 25
Comment
-
Originally posted by Awesomeness View PostOpenBSD has https://www.xenocara.org/ and all these OSes need to get their act together and finally support Wayland. Wayland switched from LGPLv2 to MIT License to accommodate the BSDs and barely anything happened in all those years. FreeBSD is furthest along, NetBSD just started, and security-focused OpenBSD is apparently just fine working around X11 bugs instead of tackling the underlying cause.
- Likes 2
Comment
Comment