Originally posted by hugo8621
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Intel Kaby Lake Linux Testing With MSI's Cubi 2 Mini PC
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by hugo8621 View Posthm, so 2 generations later, from broadwell to kaby lake and idle power didn't decrease at all...
Actually not sure if user is allowed to play with that settings on this particular device. But you probably want different and maded up benchmark, if you really wanna see what happened on idle power side.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kmand View PostAre we expecting a Koby Lake with Iris, and thats whats delay the Intel badged nucs?
Comment
-
Originally posted by chuckula View PostSo 2 generations later, from broadwell to kaby lake, and the low-efficiency wall-wart power supply didn't change at all...
I think most power in idle is consumed by the chipset and not the cpu, and that's why there isn't much change in idle power consumption since haswell.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chuckula View Post
Looks like somebody doesn't understand how electricity works. Let's fix your incorrect comment: So 2 generations later, from broadwell to kaby lake, and the low-efficiency wall-wart power supply didn't change at all...
Comment
-
Originally posted by hugo8621 View Postwhy is there always a comment from an 'you are stupid, I know better and teach you how it really is' person? Those posts seem unnecessary to me... Across all devices, with bad and good power supplies, idle power has dropped significantly in the last years. A few years back you had chipset losses that were higher then is now required to run whole computers, even though low power ones. So when I buy desktop computers, or parts of it, I check how idle power consumption is, since that is the state they spend the most time in... So 8W seems still quite high for me for a low power system like this, even with external PSU and afaik MSI is not known to sell you the cheapest chinese crap.
There were benchmarks around from a guy that made the lowest possible idle consumption PC (by mutilating a board). And it's not just chipset but also board design.
In his benchmarks some mini-itx boards + processor + RAM +SSD were consuming like 5 watts at idle or so, while other mini-itx boards with same chipset/processor/RAM/SSD were at like 15 or even 20 watts.
In his tests the processor alone in idle is at like 2 watts.
this is the benchmark he did (it's in dutch but the graphs are readable https://ssj3gohan.tweakblogs.net/blog/cat/2217 )
Comment
-
Originally posted by hugo8621 View Post
why is there always a comment from an 'you are stupid, I know better and teach you how it really is' person? Those posts seem unnecessary to me... Across all devices, with bad and good power supplies, idle power has dropped significantly in the last years. A few years back you had chipset losses that were higher then is now required to run whole computers, even though low power ones. So when I buy desktop computers, or parts of it, I check how idle power consumption is, since that is the state they spend the most time in... So 8W seems still quite high for me for a low power system like this, even with external PSU and afaik MSI is not known to sell you the cheapest chinese crap.
Comment
Comment