RadeonSI/RADV Mesa 17.3 + AMDGPU DC vs. NVIDIA 387.12 Linux Gaming Performance

Written by Michael Larabel in Graphics Cards on 25 October 2017 at 03:17 PM EDT. Page 5 of 5. 42 Comments.

RadeonSI is still performing relatively low with the GLMark2 synthetic benchmark.

ParaView was recently added to the Phoronix Test Suite as a visualization/workstation-focused test. Sadly here we see RadeonSI performing extremely poorly and see why NVIDIA dominates in the workstation space, besides CUDA and other factors driving its marketshare in that segment.

With some exceptions, overall Mesa 17.3 with RadeonSI and RADV is running fairly well against the NVIDIA Linux driver and the current selection of GeForce graphics cards. On the RadeonSI OpenGL front is where Mesa 17.3 is fairly competitive with NVIDIA for Linux gaming, but on the RADV Vulkan driver side there is still headway to be made. But Mesa 17.3 is a big upgrade over earlier Mesa releases and these Radeon numbers are overall much better than they were months ago let alone a year or more ago. It will certainly be interesting to see how the Linux graphics driver scene evolves over the months ahead as well as how upcoming Linux games perform.

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal or Stripe tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.


Related Articles
About The Author
Michael Larabel

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter, LinkedIn, or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.