Originally posted by Britoid
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Git 2.24 Released With Commit Graphs By Default, Adoption Of Contributor Covenant
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by JPFSanders View Post
It opens avenues to attack other people CoCs are dangerous slippery slopes.
If you do not feel welcomed on a group, leave, no one has any obligation to make you feel good, welcomed, appreciated or anything.
Respect is earned, not deserved.
The only people who feel excluded here are the people who are being told "Your behaviour is not appropriate".
Just like any workplace, if you start dropping racist slurs or sexist comments and making your coworkers feel uncomfortable with you, you are gonna start having a bad time with HR.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by boxie View Post
I have gone and read the CoC, it seems pretty standard - the tl;dr is "be nice to people" - how is it a bad thing?
Being nice and the Covenant are two different things.
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrgggggggggggggggggggghhh hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh hhhhhhh, the world is over.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by tildearrow View Post
Then you might be blind because the CoC subliminally encourages feminism and other things.
Being nice and the Covenant are two different things.
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrgggggggggggggggggggghhh hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh hhhhhhh, the world is over.
The gist that I picked up was that the writers don't know how to properly use neither commas nor semicolons.
For some LuLz, equal rights and feminism kicks ass if you know how to exploit it.
Cop -- Why'd you kick her in the pussy?
Me -- She called my mom a biznatch so I gave her a swift kick between the legs like I'd do to anyone else who said that about my momma. I'm a feminist and believe in equal rights for all.
Judge -- But she's a woman and....
Me --- Doesn't matter. That's sexist. A judgement based on that position violates the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Are you willing to violate Federal Equal Rights Laws over this?
Comment
-
Originally posted by skeevy420 View Post
I read it. I didn't see the subliminal feminism and other things; just the standard list of things that common sense should dictate that we wouldn't hate over that the various Sky Wizard Rule Books deem acceptable to hate over.
The gist that I picked up was that the writers don't know how to properly use neither commas nor semicolons.
For some LuLz, equal rights and feminism kicks ass if you know how to exploit it.
Cop -- Why'd you kick her in the pussy?
Me -- She called my mom a biznatch so I gave her a swift kick between the legs like I'd do to anyone else who said that about my momma. I'm a feminist and believe in equal rights for all.
Judge -- But she's a woman and....
Me --- Doesn't matter. That's sexist. A judgement based on that position violates the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Are you willing to violate Federal Equal Rights Laws over this?
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by tildearrow View PostThen you might be blind because the CoC subliminally encourages feminism and other things.
For me encouraging half the worlds population to be all that they can be is a good thing.
Originally posted by tildearrow View PostBeing nice and the Covenant are two different things.
Originally posted by tildearrow View PostAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrgggggggggggggggggggghhh hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh hhhhhhh, the world is over.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by boxie View Post
would be some giggles - but they would still book you for common assault...
FWIW, I'm not the kind of person that does overt, hot dish, revenge. I'll ruin one's life many years later by......we ain't going there, but I have my methods
Comment
-
Originally posted by skeevy420 View Post
Conversely though, would you want to contribute to a project if every other post in their forums was by their white supremacist programmers discussing final solutions?
You suffer from a serious case of mental diarrhea, if I was you I would seek urgent medical assistance.
Comment
-
Comment deleted by the author.
I misunderstood a comment.Last edited by JPFSanders; 08 November 2019, 06:49 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by archibald View PostThere is more than one meaning of the word 'respect'. In this context, it's about treating with respect rather than holding them in high regard (having respect for them). Most people treat others with respect as a matter of course. We don't scream at people or call them obscenities, even if they annoy us.
1) A feeling of deep admiration for someone or something elicited by their abilities, qualities, or achievements.
2) Due regard for the feelings, wishes, or rights of others.
I insist respect is not "deserved" it is "Earned"
What you speak of is called:
"Politeness"
behaviour that is respectful and considerate of other people.
I do not care shit about how or anybody feels, nor you should care how other people feel, feelings are the most subjective thing ever and even what you eat will affect how you feel.
Comment
Comment