Originally posted by avis
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
KDE Slimbook V Announced: The First KDE Plasma 6 Laptop With AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS CPU
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by drhoho View Post
Keep the sticks for debugging. I've been surprised how often non-ECC memory starts developing errors after a year or two.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by avis View Post
That's weird to hear. The DDR5 standard mandates built-in ECC for RAM modules. That's not a full ECC protection which must include motherboard and CPU support but most if not RAM errors in my experience have been due to faulty memory modules, not due to the CPU memory controller or motherboard traces.
Comment
-
-
The case is absolutely beautiful, and that K on the lid is nice accent.
The price point is also very attractive, I just checked to see what a system with all the options maxed out cost and the price is lusted as 2148 Euros, about $2300 American, very competitive.
Compared to some other Linux hardware vendors who shall remain nameless, this is a much more appealing option.
I do have the same reservation regarding this offering, namely what if someone buys it and decides that instead of KDE Neon they would rather install Fedora or Arch or OpenSuse and they end up messing something up.
When the buyer calls customer service, what is the response?
At the base price it only comes with a 250GB NVMe, for me the sweet spot is probably 32GB ram and 2TB NVMe for the primary drive and a 2YB NVMe for the secondary drive, which bring the price to just over 1200 Euros, or about $1300.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by caligula View PostThere's no space for a larger sensor. If you're making money by streaming nude videos in onlyfans, you might want to invest in a dedicated studio camera.
I remember during one meeting I said "excuse me while I whip this out" and then reached down in my seat and everyone's eyes lit up and to this day i do not know if they were relieved or disappointed when I pulled up my note cards so I could do my presentation.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
I'd like to see some design theory and real world statistics on the current world of RAM errors
accounting for consumer CPUs / motherboards / DDR5 / DDR4 without system level ECC.
I know just from a communications theory standpoint when you start to pressure a communications channel
for more bandwidth etc. you'll increase the error rate, often to something that's "unacceptable" at the raw level
so then you might add some correction scheme to reduce the error rate to something "acceptable" while still
having higher-enough throughput. So if I was being pessimistic I could suppose the penny pinchers
could go "ah whatever it's only consumer stuff, nobody knows or cares as long as their youtube videos play
a few hours a day before their computer crashes" and maybe DDR5+"internal" ECC reliability is
not better than non-ECCed DDR4 or could be even somewhat worse ("ah who cares") accounting for
the increased error probabilities due to higher speed, smaller RAM circuits, higher ram density / size, ...
But now we've got 256GB DDR5 vs 128G DDR4 and I was worried before.....
Originally posted by avis View Post
That's weird to hear. The DDR5 standard mandates built-in ECC for RAM modules. That's not a full ECC protection which must include motherboard and CPU support but most if not RAM errors in my experience have been due to faulty memory modules, not due to the CPU memory controller or motherboard traces.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment