Another Look At The Bcachefs Performance on Linux 6.7

[phoronix]

Phoronix: Another Look At The Bcachefs Performance on Linux 6.7

Immediately after the Bcachefs file-system was upstreamed into the Linux 6.7 kernel I began running some benchmarks on this new copy-on-write file-system. Shortly thereafter some scalability improvements and disabling a debug option by default were merged. So with the Bcachefs work for Linux 6.7 settling down the past few weeks, here's a fresh look at how Bcachefs is performing against the likes of EXT4, XFS, F2FS, and Btrfs.

https://www.phoronix.com/review/bcachefs-benchmarks-linux67

[Quackdoc]

Round 2
FIGHT

This is looking pretty nice, I got an NVME sitting, wasting away in my PC waiting for bcachefs to land in stable.

[chromer]

So it's growing, it's improving... will see the final fight.

[Yoshi]

The multidevice tests and tiering with SSD/HDD will be really interesting. But so far the single device results don't look too bad at all.

[Kjell]

Michael is single handedly guarding the upstream performance of Linux

[avis]

Michael is single handedly guarding the upstream performance of Linux

If Phoronix is the only Linux news source for you, maybe.

Intel, VMWare, Oracle and RedHat have been doing that for many years. You just don't hear/read about that.

[Kjell]

Intel and RedHat have been doing that for many years. You just don't hear/read about that.

Some heroes don't wear capes

[The the]

Wow, turns out BCachefs isn't that shitty after all!

[caligula]

Some heroes don't wear capes

Don't forget Devuan! The Appimage author's Wayland hate thread in github is also quite active: https://gist.github.com/probonopd/9f...5e3a9f2d1f2277

[mrg666]

Ext4 still looks competent though. Thanks for the benchmarks.