Originally posted by kylew77
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Archinstall 2.3 Released For Easily Installing Arch Linux
Collapse
X
-
- Likes 1
-
Originally posted by Vistaus View Post
Manjaro is probably the worst distro I've ever tried. On multiple PC s, it was always trouble, trouble and trouble. And most of the times even broken after installing their so-called stable (!) updates after a new install. And I have a couple of years of Linux experience behind me (though I'm no specialist or something). I wouldn't want any new user, in whatever sense of the word, even thinking about using Manjaro.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Vistaus View Post
If Arch is so bad as a daily driver, then why does Valve use it as a base for SteamOS?
Originally posted by dylanmtaylor View PostIt's not really that difficult, but yeah, the old wifimenu was certainly nice to have.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by hax0r View PostArch needs to support secure boot like Fedora/Ubuntu/openSUSE does with the signed shim, disabling secure boot can be problematic and unwanted, I don't get why they don't support it.
- Likes 4
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by sinepgib View Post
I don't know, should we count buildroot? (?)
Let me know if I got it straight. The idea of doing it web based is to enable the tool to be used for headless boxes too, right? That sounds damned cool.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by simonsaysthis View PostLooking forward to Arch users arguing that Arch installed with Archinstall isn't Arch.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by mirmirmir View Post
Back then, i used one line to insall everything, from bootloader, desktop, to browser. Arch installation can be very short, simple and straightforward if you know what to do. I even skipped many steps on common guide because i use GUI before and after the installation. And yet, despite everything. I was proud to tell people on Internet that i use arch btw.
Now i use different distro, i no longer see the appeal of archlinux beside for learning. I wouldn't use arch/based distro for daily driver...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by guglovich View PostDecided to try it out on a laptop the other day, and there the wi-fi connection has been changed to a more sophisticated IWD. They simplify one thing and complicate another.
iwctl -> device list -> station [device name] connect [network name] -> enter passphrase.
It's not really that difficult, but yeah, the old wifimenu was certainly nice to have.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by hax0r View PostArch needs to support secure boot like Fedora/Ubuntu/openSUSE does with the signed shim, disabling secure boot can be problematic and unwanted, I don't get why they don't support it.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by rabcor View PostTbh i don't really see much of a point to this project, the arch installation is already very easy to do and you need to be capable of doing everything it takes to install arch normally to be able to use arch (e.g. follow simple instructions on a wiki), if you can't, you're probably gonna break your installation and not know how to fix it at some point (not that that can't happen even when you can tho).
- Likes 7
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: