I wonder if there would be a similar performance increase with my Ryzen 1 CPU.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ubuntu 19.10 To 21.10: AMD Zen 2 + Radeon Performance On Linux Over Two Years
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Linuxxx View Post
Since İ've been on the lookout for a newer generation CPU, İ've been wondering as well whether 'schedutil' is a better fit for these low base clocks & high boost clocks CPUs.
İf You could compare to the 'performance' governor, that would be great!
(Although results will probably change once the "AMD-PSTATE" CPU driver lands in mainline kernels.)
I only have the one system so I have to use it by day and benchmark it by night. I really hope it doesn't scale into multiple 14 hour runs
Vistaus No idea. I don't run XanMod (but a quick glance at their patches didn't show anything that would remove it and their config shows it enabled). I use the Zen 2 build of linux-pf from this repository and it has schedutil.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by Linuxxx View Post
Just curious:
Why 'ondemand' and not 'schedutil'?
İ believe part of the improvements we see in this round of benchmarking also have to do with the switch of the CPU governors.
İf You too could do a similar comparison by means of observation, that would be similarly great!
One can see subtle, expected differences, especially between performance and powersave, however the used wattage, according to my wattmeter, are so close I cannot say I notice any meaningful difference. All were around 7,0 to 7,5 Watt for the full system with display, WiFi, Bluetooth, etc. on and Firefox and other stuff in the background with the system being idle otherwise.
ondemand:
performance:
powersave:
schedutil:
Looking forward to skeevy's results.Last edited by reba; 11 October 2021, 03:23 PM.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vistaus View Post
Schedutil doesn't seem to be available on my system (Deepin 20). Is that because I'm running the XanMod kernel?
Standard Debian kernel has powersave, performance and ondemand, IIRC.
xanmod has:
root@debian:/tmp# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_governors
conservative ondemand userspace powersave performance schedutil
root@debian:/tmp# uname -a
Linux debian 5.14.11-xanmod1-cacule #0~git20211009.664b18d SMP PREEMPT Sat Oct 9 17:44:28 UTC 2021 x86_64 GNU/Linux
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Code:[FONT=monospace][COLOR=#808080]╭─[/COLOR][COLOR=#b2b2b2][/COLOR][COLOR=#080808] [/COLOR][COLOR=#b2b2b2][/COLOR][COLOR=#e4e4e4] [/COLOR][COLOR=#eeeeee][B]~[/B][/COLOR][COLOR=#1818b2][/COLOR][COLOR=#808080]························[/COLOR][COLOR=#000000][/COLOR][COLOR=#18b218] ✔ [/COLOR][COLOR=#b2b2b2][/COLOR][COLOR=#000000] at 15:35:23 [/COLOR][COLOR=#b2b2b2][/COLOR] [COLOR=#808080]╰─[/COLOR][COLOR=#000000] cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_available_governors [/COLOR] conservative ondemand userspace powersave performance schedutil [COLOR=#808080]╭─[/COLOR][COLOR=#b2b2b2][/COLOR][COLOR=#080808] [/COLOR][COLOR=#b2b2b2][/COLOR][COLOR=#e4e4e4] [/COLOR][COLOR=#eeeeee][B]~[/B][/COLOR][COLOR=#1818b2][/COLOR][COLOR=#808080]························[/COLOR][COLOR=#000000][/COLOR][COLOR=#18b218] ✔ [/COLOR][COLOR=#b2b2b2][/COLOR][COLOR=#000000] at 15:36:24 [/COLOR][COLOR=#b2b2b2][/COLOR] [COLOR=#808080]╰─[/COLOR][COLOR=#000000] uname -r [/COLOR] 5.14.11-xanmod1-cacule-1[/FONT]
Comment
-
Originally posted by M@GOid View Post
Reviewers discovered it first, but AMD had acknowledge the issue themselves:
https://www.amd.com/en/support/kb/faq/pa-400
Comment
-
Vistaus check which scaling governor you're using
You may be using (if I remember correctly) one of the Intel one's (intel_pstate or intel_cpufreq). Can play around with Intel_pstate=disable and intel_pstate=enable in your GRUB.
The scaling governor acpi-cpufreq should show all of them. Double check with phoronix-test-suite by Michael Larabel of Phoronix fame:
Code:$ ./phoronix-test-suite system-info|head -n 15 PROCESSOR: Intel Core i5-4670K @ 4.30GHz Core Count: 4 Extensions: SSE 4.2 + AVX2 + AVX + RDRAND + FSGSBASE Cache Size: 6 MB Microcode: 0x22 Core Family: Haswell Scaling Driver: acpi-cpufreq performance (Boost: Enabled)
Code:$ cpufreq-info|grep -E 'driver|governors' driver: acpi-cpufreq available cpufreq governors: conservative, ondemand, userspace, powersave, performance, schedutil
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by perpetually high View Post
I also like the package cpufrequtils, which gives you cpufreq-info and cpufreq-set:
Code:$ cpufreq-info|grep -E 'driver|governors' driver: acpi-cpufreq available cpufreq governors: conservative, ondemand, userspace, powersave, performance, schedutil
So, totally off topic but you'll get a kick, earlier tonight I ran
Code:[FONT=monospace][COLOR=#000000]sudo mount -o remount,compress-force=zstd:15 /dev/sda2 sudo btrfs filesystem defragment -r -v / sudo compsize -x / [/COLOR] Processed 750635 files, 890436 regular extents (896758 refs), 357244 inline. Type Perc Disk Usage Uncompressed Referenced TOTAL 66% 70G 106G 107G none 100% 42G 42G 43G zstd 44% 28G 64G 64G [/FONT]
Unfortunately, I was more interested in if I could rather than the before and after.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
How the hell is VP9 encoding THAT much slower than h265?! I thought I'd misread the labels at first, but nope: apparently it really is somwhere from 5x to 10x slower, to produce worse results.
I mean, sure, on the plus side at least it's not an MPEG standard with all the BS that entails (though VPx has basically no client HW support, whereas h265 has been ubiquitous for years) - but...
Am I missing something after all, and this isn't actually apples to apples? Or is the VP9 encoder really just catastrophically bad?
Comment
Comment