This absolutely sucks. I saw some folks on this thread supporting Red Hat's decision (like @dubby229 ) , and I think you are a bit confused on the topic. Here's a few points:
-CentOS is mostly used as a Headless server (that means, no GUI, only ssh terminal)
-There are millions of servers running CentOS right now, not only huge companies use it, but many small ones do as well.
-Many of these companies do support open source and submit changes and contributions to CentOS (this is really common).
-These servers are meant to be very stable and not be messed with, the goal here is to have your applications running and only update when you are absolutely sure it's stable for you, while keeping security in check (sometimes security updates can be unstable as well, that's why you need a well curated and stable repo).
-While you can get RHEL for free technically, you are allowed to download it for testing purposes, as Red Hat tells you NOT to use it on production and to buy a license from them.
-If you run RHEL anyway without paying, the OS is full of warnings that tell you to get a subscription, and you need to reconfigure many settings in order to get this working without any limitations.
-Centos Stream was yet another distro, meant to be an in-between on CentOS and Fedora. The idea was really neat as it could help you test and prepare yourself before moving into the next Centos version. It was a cool idea to have even as a Workstation OS, so your developers could test stuff locally first and see how the new packages are working with your applications.
-This change doesn't help to reduce fragmentation, as we are NOT putting CentosStream on production, now then, not now. Creating Stream was fragmenting, killing Centos is not a solution for that.
-Fedora is neat, I use it personally, but even Fedora Server doesn't compare to Centos Stability (specially on Back-Ported applications).
-There were TONS of developers contributing to CentOS, it was a real community alternative to RHEL. I don't see any of them changing to CentoStream all of the sudden. At work we were contributing to centos, after these news we see absolutely no point in doing so if this change is for real.
I don't know what are we going to do with our servers, they currently run Centos7 so I guess we have time to see if anything changes before starting to migrate to something else. We do have some OpenSUSE hosts, so we might go that path, which sucks as we were really well integrated with .RPM packages.
-CentOS is mostly used as a Headless server (that means, no GUI, only ssh terminal)
-There are millions of servers running CentOS right now, not only huge companies use it, but many small ones do as well.
-Many of these companies do support open source and submit changes and contributions to CentOS (this is really common).
-These servers are meant to be very stable and not be messed with, the goal here is to have your applications running and only update when you are absolutely sure it's stable for you, while keeping security in check (sometimes security updates can be unstable as well, that's why you need a well curated and stable repo).
-While you can get RHEL for free technically, you are allowed to download it for testing purposes, as Red Hat tells you NOT to use it on production and to buy a license from them.
-If you run RHEL anyway without paying, the OS is full of warnings that tell you to get a subscription, and you need to reconfigure many settings in order to get this working without any limitations.
-Centos Stream was yet another distro, meant to be an in-between on CentOS and Fedora. The idea was really neat as it could help you test and prepare yourself before moving into the next Centos version. It was a cool idea to have even as a Workstation OS, so your developers could test stuff locally first and see how the new packages are working with your applications.
-This change doesn't help to reduce fragmentation, as we are NOT putting CentosStream on production, now then, not now. Creating Stream was fragmenting, killing Centos is not a solution for that.
-Fedora is neat, I use it personally, but even Fedora Server doesn't compare to Centos Stability (specially on Back-Ported applications).
-There were TONS of developers contributing to CentOS, it was a real community alternative to RHEL. I don't see any of them changing to CentoStream all of the sudden. At work we were contributing to centos, after these news we see absolutely no point in doing so if this change is for real.
I don't know what are we going to do with our servers, they currently run Centos7 so I guess we have time to see if anything changes before starting to migrate to something else. We do have some OpenSUSE hosts, so we might go that path, which sucks as we were really well integrated with .RPM packages.
Comment