Originally posted by xfcedebian
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Debian 10 "Buster" Currently Defaults To GNOME On Wayland, But That Still Could Change
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by jacob View Post
You're probably right. After all, XFCE has solved all problems that have ever existed or will ever exist, and is by definition immune to the evil malware that supports Wayland, is written in Rust and uses systemD.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by xfcedebian View Post
Thank you! Finally a sane, rational member here who understands the developer of Xfce is literally Jesus. Also thank you for not disagreeing with me, since that would be a violation of the Debian Code of Conduct.
You can see in this link that it has 0 bugs.
proof that xfce is the most fastestst desktop and smoothetest low latency desktop
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by xfcedebian View Post
Thank you! Finally a sane, rational member here who understands the developer of Xfce is literally Jesus. Also thank you for not disagreeing with me, since that would be a violation of the Debian Code of Conduct.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by retardxfce View Post
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by xfcemint View PostGnome Shell is retarded, everyone knows that. It is a DE for retards.
JetBrains releases its State of the Developer Ecosystem 2018 report, which finds Go is the most promising programming language this year
It is written on the internet and so is true. It is known.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by Britoid View PostWayland represents change, people hate change.
Originally posted by Britoid View Postsame thing as with systemd etc.
This forum has the hugest amount of arrogant narrow minded users I've ever seen.
Comment
-
Originally posted by debianxfce View Post
Java software is slow and uses more hw resources than C/C++ software. Gnome Shell is bad, it needs 23 extensions to be usable and then it uses 1Gb RAM and is slow.
How to turn gnome shell from hell to hell:
Unused RAM is wasted RAM, Gnome runs fine for me on 8GB.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kaprikawn View PostUnused RAM is wasted RAM
This kind of thinking that promotes sloppy code and wasteful behaviors, which in turn forces people to upgrade their hardware that otherwise should have been perfectly capable of handling a certain workload. If you have unused RAM, that should be because you bought too much.
Ranting aside... I do agree that GNOME doesn't have a RAM problem, at least not inherently. I've run it just fine on systems with only 2GB. All it takes is killing off some unnecessary bloated services. The same can be said of a default XFCE install for most distros.
- Likes 3
Comment
Comment