Originally posted by rabcor
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
GNOME Developers Are Hoping To Further Improve NetworkManager
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Adriannho View PostWhat????
Even if you dont run services, having a static IP means you will regularly boot to desktop without network.
Bug in Networkmanager for almost 10 years (heck sometime in 2008 setting a static IP wouldnt even work), or prolly something they dont even have a concept for it - since you shouldnt run anything but a laptop.
Comment
-
Originally posted by FLHerne View PostOh, finally. The only purpose of nmcli at present is so idjits can say "but NetworkManager does have a CLI, that's not a reason to avoid it!".
Better late than never, though.Originally posted by M@yeulC View PostI hope we can finally see a Wi-Fi connection menu à la wifi-menu. Even with a command line interface, I find this way too complicated. A curses interface or something similar would be great indeed, at least in my opinion.
Or, at least make the command line switches less cryptic (or is it just me?).
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by discordian View PostTry running a server with a static IP and services that bind to sockets early. You`ll either have to run "service networking restart" every time after boot or kick this crap of your system.
Even if you dont run services, having a static IP means you will regularly boot to desktop without network.
Bug in Networkmanager for almost 10 years (heck sometime in 2008 setting a static IP wouldnt even work), or prolly something they dont even have a concept for it - since you shouldnt run anything but a laptop.
This sounds like a bug in startup service order. Do you have a bug link?
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by oleid View Post
For starters: Why do you need NM for a static IP.
Replacement UIs for setting network configuration getting harder to find too, especially if they should fit to gnome3.
Originally posted by oleid View PostThis sounds like a bug in startup service order. Do you have a bug link?
Comment
Comment