Very nice
Fate's irony - Netflix contribute something to open-source project but in the same time - it cannot be used for Netflix content in Linux.
I mean: Netflix 10-bit 4K content has insane DRM requirements - there is no free Linux distribution that could handle it. Only commercial forks like Android on dedicated hardware could handle it.
No HDR support in Linux distributions it is another story, but at least in this area there is some progress...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
AV1 Decoder dav1d Lands 10-bit AVX2 Assembly For Big Speed-Up, Thanks Facebook + Netflix
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by andreano View PostI hope this unlocks more 10-bit content. For those that may not know, 8-bit encoding does not save any space (on the contrary, you need more bitrate to avoid banding). It only makes sense for decoding performance.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by cl333r View Post
Hm interesting, I've never heard this argument before, the only thing I heard was that jpegxl is better than or equal to AVIF at everything.
Originally posted by curfew View PostI beg to differ. Software decoding causes my laptop's fans to spin up like crazy. Firefox recently optimized their hardware decoding to be about 50 % more efficient than in previous versions, so now the difference should be pretty major, although I haven't tried that. But even video players are horribly slow in software rendering mode.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
I hope this unlocks more 10-bit content. For those that may not know, 8-bit encoding does not save any space (on the contrary, you need more bitrate to avoid banding). It only makes sense for decoding performance.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Quackdoc View PostAVIF pales in comparison to jpegxl for stills, but far exceeds it in animations due to the video encoding capabilities of av1.
but no one seems to care about it as firefox STILL cannot ay avif animations (Chrome has been able to for a long time now).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by curfew View PostI beg to differ. Software decoding causes my laptop's fans to spin up like crazy. Firefox recently optimized their hardware decoding to be about 50 % more efficient than in previous versions, so now the difference should be pretty major, although I haven't tried that. But even video players are horribly slow in software rendering mode.
Actually, I don't exactly know how it's using the CPU but I noticed that at like 1080p30 it may be using around 20-30% CPU but it keeps its clock pretty low, around 0.9 to 2.0GHz, while it's a CPU that go up to 3.2GHz on all cores and 3.5GHz using single core, so it definitely still has a lot of headroom.
So sure, SW rendering is heavy, but on a 6 years old high end mobile CPU, it runs like a charm, surprisingly, which is why I also activated AV1 onall resolutions and also noticed a very large amount of videos being encoded with it (basically every single music video are AV1) and it's only getting faster, and from memory, Chrome isn't even using dav1d but its own sx decoder
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Toggleton View PostNearly all videos that are AV1 on Youtube are 8bit and 8bit is already fast on nearly all CPUs.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by scineram View PostI hope Firefox picks up these optimizations soon. My next processor will be Cézanne without hw acceleration, but I will still unblock AV1 on Youtube since software decode will be fast enough.
In this playlist are videos that have a av1 10bit(+HDR) version but even if you set Youtube to "always prefer AV1" it does not serve it in firefox on a ryzen3600.
With youtube-dl - f 401+251 URL
will you get the av1 version to test it (399=1080p 400=1440p 401=4k)
- Likes 3
Leave a comment:
-
I hope Firefox picks up these optimizations soon. My next processor will be Cézanne without hw acceleration, but I will still unblock AV1 on Youtube since software decode will be fast enough.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: