Originally posted by flashmozzg
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Chrome 89 Preparing To Ship With AV1 Encoder For WebRTC Usage
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by darkbasic View Post
AV1 surely isn't, can't decode anything past 720p on Youtube with my desktop computer.
i5 2500K should easily reach ~100+ fps on 1080p videos,
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by pal666 View Postyou mean for those of us who are ms slaves like you?
I use Ubuntu and Windows 10, and like both. I code in C# / .NET as well as Python, PHP, Kotlin, JavaScript, TypeScript and Rust.
Personally I prefer Firefox myself, but I've tried Chrome, Chromium and Edge too. While I do prefer Firefox, I do think Edge is a better version of Chrome than Chrome.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dirlewanger88
I physically vomit every time I read such terrible grammar on this website.
either way firefox is constantly lagging behind Chrome and is becoming harder to support.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by piotrj3 View Post
Problem is aomenc is very very slow. Rav1e is somewhere in middle and SVT-AV1 is by far faster. Using aomenc for realtime encoding seems to be by far worst choice.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by piotrj3 View Post
Problem is aomenc is very very slow. Rav1e is somewhere in middle and SVT-AV1 is by far faster. Using aomenc for realtime encoding seems to be by far worst choice.
Svt-av1 is probably a good alternative, but its lacking in some quality, it is much faster at traditional linear rendering. although Aomenc is faster when using per scene encoding, thats not very useful for live streaming.
I am assuming they decided SVT-AV1 is still too immature for their use case, though i see this changing in the future
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: