Althought it's not the very first in performance according to these tests, in my personal experience, Solus was the more responsive distro in my old notebook. Programs used to open instantly. And the UX was fluently nice. Really love this distro.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Benchmarks Of Solus vs. Other Linux Distributions & BSDs
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by profoundWHALE View PostI'm impressed by both Solus and DragonflyBSD. I would not have expected those two to do as well as they did. Solus is beating or coming close to Clear Linux (Intel), and DragonflyBSD is beating TrueOS (FreeBSD)
----
In regards to the date-time format, I name it like I would organize a folder hierarchy.
2016\12\31 (as in 2016-12-31 for a file name)
Simple stuff, keeps it organized. Our time and calendar systems are still dumb though.
Comment
-
Arch seems well rounded distribution.
On dates..., it's just a matter of what you are used to. I'm used to DMY with 24h format, and for me it makes sense, most important and relevant information first (day, month), less relevant informationa t last place (year), since most documents are short-term, in long term it doesn't really matter since you have to read it all anyway, and all information is equaly important. 24h vs. AM/PM is another topic, and in short spoken term (per day basis) AM/PM is easier and better to use, when you want to meet with someone on that particular day,a nd it's already 10:20 in the morning for example, you say, I'll meet you in 8, at that location, lot's of people in places where 24h format is used actually speak that way on per day basis, sicne AM/PM or any specification about it is not needed in that situation. On long-term, usually they use 24h.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by ikey_solus View PostSome local changes I'm now testing have already yielded some interesting results http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1...RI-1704100RI76 (syncing flags + fixing env)
Comment
-
Originally posted by leipero View PostArch seems well rounded distribution.
On dates..., it's just a matter of what you are used to. I'm used to DMY with 24h format, and for me it makes sense, most important and relevant information first (day, month), less relevant informationa t last place (year), since most documents are short-term, in long term it doesn't really matter since you have to read it all anyway, and all information is equaly important. 24h vs. AM/PM is another topic, and in short spoken term (per day basis) AM/PM is easier and better to use, when you want to meet with someone on that particular day,a nd it's already 10:20 in the morning for example, you say, I'll meet you in 8, at that location, lot's of people in places where 24h format is used actually speak that way on per day basis, sicne AM/PM or any specification about it is not needed in that situation. On long-term, usually they use 24h.
Comment
-
Originally posted by cj.wijtmans View PostYeah i gave a bad example, the numbers should be different.
Comment
Comment