Originally posted by lucasbekker
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
X.Org Server 1.20 RC4 Released, EGLStreams For XWayland Might Still Land
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by pgoetz View Post
Exactly. My users use scientific software that uses CUDA. Not having Nvidia cards is not an option. Unfortunately all this will do is force us to stay on X.
Not having Nvidia cards is an option. I'm not suggesting that Nvidia should be excluded from Wayland, I'm suggesting Nvidia should be forced to support GBM like everyone else who cares about a healthy FOSS ecosystem. And that force should come in the form of a certain quote from Linus whenever Nvidia push EGL streams. And if they don't want to support GBM then that's up to them. In that case, if you're an Nvidia user who wants to use Wayland then sucks to be you.
Comment
-
Originally posted by pgoetz View PostExactly. My users use scientific software that uses CUDA. Not having Nvidia cards is not an option. Unfortunately all this will do is force us to stay on X.
- Likes 4
Comment
-
Originally posted by pgoetz View Post
Exactly. My users use scientific software that uses CUDA.
I always thought best business practice is to avoid becoming dependant on one vendor.
- Likes 7
Comment
-
Originally posted by DanL View PostWhether it gets merged or not has nothing to do with ideological reasons.
Originally posted by DanL View PostAre you the same Lucio guy that subscribed to the mailing list to tell the devs how evil EGLStreams is? If so, please don't waste their time with that crap. They don't care. If you have something technical to say about the code, that's great, but don't try to start a holy war on the Xorg mailing list FFS.
TBH, you seem scared by my crap.
Last edited by lucrus; 11 April 2018, 12:43 PM.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by LoneVVolf View Post
So nvidia has got you/your users in a tight vendor-lock-in grip and you prefer to keep it that way ?
I always thought best business practice is to avoid becoming dependant on one vendor.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Khrundel View PostCurrently there are only two desktop GPU vendors which offer some degree of performance. So, making some software GBM-only or CUDA-only, both mean vendor locking.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by Khrundel View PostCurrently there are only two desktop GPU vendors which offer some degree of performance. So, making some software GBM-only or CUDA-only, both mean vendor locking.
GBM is for display, CUDA is for computing, great apples and oranges comparison.
Were you afraid of talking about our lord and saviour OpenCL?
And even then, GBM is not proprietary and patented, any vendor can use it. CUDA is, and whoever tries to offer CUDA on their hardware will get sued to hell by NVIDIA.
- Likes 3
Comment
Comment