I believe that Average Joe comparisons so what he found in distro and just run that, than some Gentoo user who just compiled everthing to the today's commits with who knows what broken flags maybe even -Ofast
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
NVIDIA Linux Vulkan Performance vs. RADV / AMDGPU-PRO
Collapse
X
-
It is even more amazing to me is that 15.9 does not actually have dota profile, so that is faster then mesa 12 while not being even profiled yet
Well it is better to run amdgpu against amdgpu-pro these days anyway... but also some next 16.40 based and real new, so that comparison will be on both up to date
Comment
-
Originally posted by dungeon View PostThere as i see is 4.5.13399 which is Catalyst 15.9 so more then year old something, against still 12 release of mesa and still default radeon driver for CIK... so i see that as all correct not pushed over comparison
Also, you were making comparisons and drawing conclusions as if only 1 variable (the hardware) had changed, when that wasn't the case. 2 variables had changed, meaning it's not valid to assume that 1 of them is responsible for the result you were seeing.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by GruenSein View PostSo the main take-away here: Nvidia's OpenGL-Drivers are still superior in this particular benchmark (as in most others) and has less overhead when things become CPU-limited,
Originally posted by GruenSein View PostMesa is close to the AMD proprietary driver in OpenGL
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by pal666 View Postnice imagination, but no, windows red team can't join effort with linux-only driver
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by M@yeulC View PostWould you care to provide a bit more details? Mesa is Linux-only, as far as I know, and there are quite a lot of developers already working on it.
Oh, and DAL developers apparently didn't work on Linux before this effort.
Comment
Comment