Originally posted by blackout23
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Vulkan Support Still Isn't Ready For Ubuntu's Mir
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Khrundel View PostAFAIR, they have promised to implement Wayland front-end as well. So, the only difference is that Mir will have 1 additional lightweight front-end for Ubuntu phone apps.
Any Wayland-only software are either test drivers specific to developing Wayland servers, bespoke single-purpose applications, or will languish in obscurity as unfinished hobby projects. The same goes for Mir-only software. Everything else will be sensible and use one of the toolkits out there that hides the deets on how your frames get sent to a display, toolkits like Qt, GTK+, libSDL2, and the like.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by starshipeleven View PostIt's weird, they must have taken shortcuts to support other stuff with amdgpu-pro.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
There wouldn't be any differences in the kernel driver that would affect Wayland support AFAIK - more likely something related to buffer management that the closed source GL driver needs to learn about. I'm not sure there are problems btw, just don't think they would be related to open-based components.
My understanding is that DAL plugs into the standard interfaces; IIRC it also implements atomic modesetting while the upstream code does not.Test signature
Comment
-
I understand your point, I just don't agree with it. If DAL is so important for AMD then it should be upstream. I've heard contention that it only has a proprietary consumer, then adapt the oss drivers so they consume it too. My only point is that amdgpu-pro should be using a completely stock kernel driver. That it's not seems to be hurting it. There are multiple instances where the stock kernel driver works properly and amdgpu-pro doesn't. Perhaps it's true that DAL isn't the particular cause of this issue. But it must be some difference between the two.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
And of course the reply is stuck in the mod que again...
short version is, Perhaps it's true that DAL isn't the particular cause of this issue, but it must be some difference from the stock kernel. I don't necessarily think DAL is wrong or bad, but rather that differences between them is bad. The sooner you get them totally consolidated the better.
Comment
-
Originally posted by arboy84 View PostWhen is Canonical going to stop throwing good money after bad and end development of Mir? Is saving face really worth that much money? Is there any technical reason not to switch to Wayland?
They could branch libweston and play catch up within a year.
Comment
-
Originally posted by duby229 View PostThat's not exactly what AMD promised though. If they keep it up at this rate amdgpu-pro will have the same problems as catalysts kernel driver. I'm not really a big fan of DAL. It's ruining the show. It should be using a completely unmodified stock upstream kernel driver, that was the entire point.
amdgpu/-pro is still in heavy development and is barely supporting the latest GPU line from AMD, I suspect they had to make choices and decided that sheer hardware support and half-decent gaming on their newer hardware has the priority over wayland that is still not really close.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bregma View PostAny Wayland-only software are either test drivers specific to developing Wayland servers, bespoke single-purpose applications, or will languish in obscurity as unfinished hobby projects. The same goes for Mir-only software. Everything else will be sensible and use one of the toolkits out there that hides the deets on how your frames get sent to a display, toolkits like Qt, GTK+, libSDL2, and the like.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by jo-erlend View PostRemember, even after all these years of bragging, the Wayland community still hasn't shown as much as a prototype for a display server.
The only ones bragging so far have been Canonical. Remember they promised Unity 8 / Mir as alternate session for 13.10 and as default with full convergence for 14.04. Almost 3 years later and the desktop Unity 8 session is still not alpha-material yet.
It's still the old idea of server-less setup. When you require a server, it doesn't make sense to go for the server-less initiative. How difficult can this really be to comprehend?
Unity 8/Mir isn't any different besides that there's an extra binary running with an extra API between Unity 8 and Mir.
- Likes 2
Comment
Comment