Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Updated and Optimized Ubuntu Free Graphics Drivers
Collapse
X
-
Next upload for Ubuntu 22.04/jammy will have rusticl disabled (see here for some more info).
-
eitch : you should report it here: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/issues
nir2142 : I don't plan a stable mesa PPA
Leave a comment:
-
hello oibaf
just want to ask,
if i want to stay with 23.3 channel what is the best way?
do you have a ppa for this? or do you know another ppa ?
can i suggest you something?
it would be great if you have 2 channel
1) ppa-mesa-stable for the latest stable mesa release
2) ppa-mesa-next for the next mesa release
and when the ppa-mesa-stable will update to the next version than also the ppa-mesa-next will update to the next version
i hope you don't kill me for suggesting itLast edited by nir2142; 27 October 2023, 02:55 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
After upgrading to 24.x i've been having core dumps and segfaults in Steam and other apps. And i wasn't able to see libglx info, it was said something about not finding the driver and some variables. Does anyone else know of this? Are there some packages missing, which haven't been updated yet?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Entropy512 View Post
[ATTACH]n1417407[/ATTACH]
Yup, that IS much cleaner, thanks for the pointer. I also tweaked it to have a WSL_ARCHS define similar to how RUSTICL_ARCHS is used when the arch list is referenced multiple timesCode:#Copy spirv2dxil...
- standard Debian / Ubuntu users could also benefit from it;
- could eventually get some improvements from Debian / Ubuntu packagers;
- it would ease to manage my PPA (less differences, so easier to sync when I do it from time to time).
The git repo is here:
Your patch should just need minor modification for the Debian package.Last edited by oibaf; 25 October 2023, 04:45 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by oibaf View Post
Thanks, I had a look at it, I think a better approach (at least, something similar to what it is already done) would be something like the install of rusticl.icd, starting at line number 285 in original rules file. Can you have a look doing it this way?
Yup, that IS much cleaner, thanks for the pointer. I also tweaked it to have a WSL_ARCHS define similar to how RUSTICL_ARCHS is used when the arch list is referenced multiple times
Leave a comment:
-
News:- packages for 23.04/lunar are now removed;
- packages for 24.04/noble are added!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Entropy512 View PostOibaf,
We've exchanged a few emails privately, but now that my Phoronix verification email FINALLY came through, may as well move this into a public forum since nothing needs to be private.
Since my last email, I did a bit more digging into the issues with enabling Microsoft Dozen (dzn), and I'm guessing the issue was that putting spirv2dxil and its dependencies into mesa-vulkan-drivers.install would choke on platforms that did not actually build Dozen (anything but amd64 and arm64).
Attached is a proof-of-concept patch (remove the .txt extension since Phoronix won't let you upload something with the extension .patch) that should allow building dzn on appropriate platforms without choking on other architectures. There's probably a cleaner way to do this though? Any thoughts as to other methods to conditionally install files based on architecture? [ATTACH]n1417230[/ATTACH]
Leave a comment:
-
Oibaf,
We've exchanged a few emails privately, but now that my Phoronix verification email FINALLY came through, may as well move this into a public forum since nothing needs to be private.
Since my last email, I did a bit more digging into the issues with enabling Microsoft Dozen (dzn), and I'm guessing the issue was that putting spirv2dxil and its dependencies into mesa-vulkan-drivers.install would choke on platforms that did not actually build Dozen (anything but amd64 and arm64).
Attached is a proof-of-concept patch (remove the .txt extension since Phoronix won't let you upload something with the extension .patch) that should allow building dzn on appropriate platforms without choking on other architectures. There's probably a cleaner way to do this though? Any thoughts as to other methods to conditionally install files based on architecture? build_dozen.patch.txt
Leave a comment:
-
I found a way to downgrade the ppa without ppa-purge
Putting a file with
Code:Package: * Pin: release a=mantic Pin-Priority: 1001 Package: * Pin: release a=mantic-updates Pin-Priority: 1001 Package: * Pin: release a=mantic-security Pin-Priority: 1001 Package: * Pin: release a=mantic-backports Pin-Priority: 1001 Package: * Pin: release o=LP-PPA-oibaf-graphics-drivers Pin-Priority: -1
disable the ppa in sources and make sudo apt dist-upgrade
remove the file after downgradeLast edited by paregistrase; 17 October 2023, 03:21 AM.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: