Originally posted by CommunityMember
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
There's A Proposal To Switch Fedora 33 On The Desktop To Using Btrfs
Collapse
X
-
- Likes 5
-
Originally posted by MadeUpName View PostUmmm. F____ no!!!! While BTRFS has some merit on the server, on the desktop ... hell no. I spend about half my time on the desktop editing movies and pictures and a copy on write file system is shite for that.
- Likes 9
Comment
-
Originally posted by Space Heater View PostI would have hoped they would talk about the real world performance differences between btrfs and ext4/xfs, and back that up with real benchmarks.
Originally posted by Space Heater View PostAlso I'm not very comfortable with defaulting to a filesystem where a developer said this month
- Likes 4
Comment
-
Originally posted by profoundWHALE View PostIf you want speed, then choose EXT4.
If you want stability, choose XFS.
If you want security and advanced features, choose ZFS.
- Likes 5
Comment
-
Originally posted by 240Hz View PostBTRFS is extremly slow on the Desktop
I run btrfs everywhere and where I have old and slow mechanical disks performances are not optimal.
however the benefits of using btrfs are more valuable than the speed (in my case);
Probably it would make sense to propose btrfs as the default fs only when installing on SSD, where btrfs performances are on par (or, sometimes better) than classic fiesystem.
- Likes 4
Comment
Comment