what??
Why bother putting in the effort of keeping the information in sync with the features you're actually using? This also implies keeping back those that work off of the released documentation, which I'm actually very worried about. That can be considered anti competitive behaviour.
I can understand competition reasons but you could also say that it is must easier to just release it all and focus on innovation and not worry about competition. This is the new paradigm anyway: innovate or die.
Let the open developers come up with new and interesting way of using your hardware... :-)
Also, in your next architecture, just split out the encumbered parts into separate blocks and do not release info about them. Release everything for the rest :-)
Originally posted by bridgman
View Post
I can understand competition reasons but you could also say that it is must easier to just release it all and focus on innovation and not worry about competition. This is the new paradigm anyway: innovate or die.
Let the open developers come up with new and interesting way of using your hardware... :-)
Also, in your next architecture, just split out the encumbered parts into separate blocks and do not release info about them. Release everything for the rest :-)
Comment