If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Radeon RX 460 Released, Linux Review Later This Week
I'm not a cooling expert but my HD4670 at 59W TDP actually cooled better with a Zalman heatsink than it did with the shitty fan it came with. 75W doesn't seem like that much more.
I'd say it is a bit cheating as with the cooler on that side it's getting some airflow from CPU fan, and also plain heat convection helps unless you keep your case horizontal or something.
I'm not a cooling expert but my HD4670 at 59W TDP actually cooled better with a Zalman heatsink than it did with the shitty fan it came with. 75W doesn't seem like that much more.
I'd say it is a bit cheating as with the cooler on that side it's getting some airflow from CPU fan, and also plain heat convection helps unless you keep your case horizontal or something.
Still interesting, but I've yet to see modern cards with the cooler on the other side.
I'm not a cooling expert but my HD4670 at 59W TDP actually cooled better with a Zalman heatsink than it did with the shitty fan it came with. 75W doesn't seem like that much more.
I'd say it is a bit cheating as with the cooler on that side it's getting some airflow from CPU fan, and also plain heat convection helps unless you keep your case horizontal or something.
Still interesting, but I've yet to see modern cards with the cooler on the other side.
Uh... those cards draw considerably more than 75 watts in real-world situations and in order to comply with PCIe and not fry any more motherboards it's pretty obvious why there's a 6-pin connector there: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...60,4707-5.html
Ahem, the article says:
"this is Asus' interpretation of the RX 460, which benefits from factory overclocking in our performance charts, but pays the price when we measure power."
On Windows, better than a GTX950 in DirectX12/Vulkan and worse on DX11/OpenGL. A little disappointing considering that this card will be available in Europe at 140€, more or less.
There is plenty of space for a RX465, one that can compete with GTX960 in DX11/OGL and GTX970 in DX12/Vulkan. Again, this is for Windows. For Linux i suppose that they will perform worse in every scenario, unfortunately.
Judging from Michael's recent 480 benchmarks, only the RX 480 can match a GTX 960 (maybe Superclocked version) with OpenGL and GTX 970 with Vulkan on Linux with most game benchmarks.
On Windows, better than a GTX950 in DirectX12/Vulkan and worse on DX11/OpenGL. A little disappointing considering that this card will be available in Europe at 140€, more or less.
There is plenty of space for a RX465, one that can compete with GTX960 in DX11/OGL and GTX970 in DX12/Vulkan. Again, this is for Windows. For Linux i suppose that they will perform worse in every scenario, unfortunately.
Uh... those cards draw considerably more than 75 watts in real-world situations and in order to comply with PCIe and not fry any more motherboards it's pretty obvious why there's a 6-pin connector there: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...60,4707-5.html
AFAIK the 75W rating was for reference clocks, but the cards shipping today seem to be mostly factory OC.
Not that likely, at least for now. That's still a 75 watt TDP GPU, you cannot dissipate even 1/3 that if you go fanless (without silly huge heatsinks anyway).
I had a passively cooled nearly 110 W TDP HD3870 (Sapphire Ultimate) and well, it worked. Of course it did have quite a lot of fins and heatpipes and without energy management back in the days in the free driver... uh-oh. ;-)
But there were even coolers for CPUs up to 95W+ so it's possible, but you won't see it often.
As long as the card does have a silent and good quality fan I'll also be okay with a non-fanless card.
Leave a comment: