Originally posted by CochainComplex
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Sony Contributes ~73%+ Performance Improvement For exFAT Linux Driver
Collapse
X
-
- Likes 1
-
Originally posted by piorunz View PostI never used that filesystem to be honest. What are its advantages? It's open source? It comes from Microsoft, right?
- Likes 3
Leave a comment:
-
I'm wondering how this compares to the performance of ext4, ext3, ext2. Maybe even without journaling.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by jacob View Post
It is open source and has one HUGE advantage: like (V)FAT it offers perfect interoperability by being supported by everything and everyone. But unlike (V)FAT, it's 64 bit so it doesn't suffer from the same volume size limitations. I think (but don't take my word for it) that it also got rid of that horrible hack in VFAT that allowed long file names on top of the old 8+3 format. Instead it supports long file names natively.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
That percentage figure is strangely inverted and not intuitive at all. I'd be saying it's four times faster!
- Likes 3
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by piorunz View PostI never used that filesystem to be honest. What are its advantages? It's open source? It comes from Microsoft, right?
- Likes 6
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by piorunz View PostI never used that filesystem to be honest. What are its advantages? It's open source? It comes from Microsoft, right?
- Likes 10
Leave a comment:
-
I never used that filesystem to be honest. What are its advantages? It's open source? It comes from Microsoft, right?
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: