AMD Rembrandt CPUFreq vs. AMD P-State Linux Testing

Written by Michael Larabel in Software on 3 October 2022 at 11:30 AM EDT. Page 6 of 6. 18 Comments.
Rembrandt CPUFreq vs. P-State
Rembrandt CPUFreq vs. P-State
Rembrandt CPUFreq vs. P-State
Rembrandt CPUFreq vs. P-State
Rembrandt CPUFreq vs. P-State
Rembrandt CPUFreq vs. P-State
Rembrandt CPUFreq vs. P-State
Rembrandt CPUFreq vs. P-State
Rembrandt CPUFreq vs. P-State
Rembrandt CPUFreq vs. P-State
Rembrandt CPUFreq vs. P-State

The results varied quite a bit between the different workload characteristics. It largely depends upon what workloads you are most engaged in and how much you care about performance vs. power savings for which governor can make the most sense.

Rembrandt CPUFreq vs. P-State

In total I ran more than 100 different benchmarks while also analyzing the CPU peak frequency, CPU temp, and system power consumption on a per-test basis. See all of the data via this OpenBenchmarking.org result file for those wanting to analyze all of the data in fine detail for what tests are most relevant to your usage. Overall though particularly in the amd-pstate schedutil configuration as is increasingly becoming the default among Linux distributions, there were at times arguably poor CPU frequency scaling decisions made that led to much lower performance than the rest. The amd-pstate performance mode tended to deliver the best performance overall and usually with only marginal increases to the battery power consumption rate.

If you enjoyed this article consider joining Phoronix Premium to view this site ad-free, multi-page articles on a single page, and other benefits. PayPal or Stripe tips are also graciously accepted. Thanks for your support.


Related Articles
About The Author
Michael Larabel

Michael Larabel is the principal author of Phoronix.com and founded the site in 2004 with a focus on enriching the Linux hardware experience. Michael has written more than 20,000 articles covering the state of Linux hardware support, Linux performance, graphics drivers, and other topics. Michael is also the lead developer of the Phoronix Test Suite, Phoromatic, and OpenBenchmarking.org automated benchmarking software. He can be followed via Twitter, LinkedIn, or contacted via MichaelLarabel.com.