Originally posted by kebabbert
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Linux hacker compares Solaris kernel code:
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by kebabbert View PostHe talks about the source code, not the design. Con Kolivas thinks the code is beatiful and admires it, after been used to work with Linux devs. CK says so.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vim_User View PostIsn't it funny how the antiBSD troll and Pawlerson come in a double pack in any thread about Solaris or BSD related topics, just like how the antiBSD troll answered his own pathetic accusations before with his alternate accounts?
May it be that Pawlerson is the antiBSD troll?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vim_User View PostHey, when the moderator has a look at this thread he can also look at the IPs used to post here by different people, I doubt that the antiBSD troll is intelligent enough to use proxies.
Comment
-
Hm... Should I get into this?
Originally posted by OpenSLOWlarisFact: Linus is use, academically and professionally in universities
The last time I tried OpenSolaris (some time ago) it definitely had a higher memory footprint than an equivalent linux system and I think I noticed that it was a little bit slower. But all in all it was ok.
What I have not seen from any of the trolls here is any actual data on how much slower (or unreliable or whatever they claim) it really is.
Now I personally do prefer Linux and I think I prefer the GPL too. But I don't see how repeating unfounded claims over and over again helps your "cause" in any way.
Soooo, please back up your claims or keep quiet. Thanks.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ChrisXY View PostHm... Should I get into this?
At the university I attend (in at least one department) there are some Solaris servers that run just fine. They host a couple of linux VMs that also run fine. There are also some Linux and some Windows servers that also run fine.
The last time I tried OpenSolaris (some time ago) it definitely had a higher memory footprint than an equivalent linux system and I think I noticed that it was a little bit slower. But all in all it was ok.
What I have not seen from any of the trolls here is any actual data on how much slower (or unreliable or whatever they claim) it really is.
Now I personally do prefer Linux and I think I prefer the GPL too. But I don't see how repeating unfounded claims over and over again helps your "cause" in any way.
Soooo, please back up your claims or keep quiet. Thanks.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RealNC View PostHe wasn't. But that's usual trolling BS. Nice job :-) You must have no real life whatsoever, right?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pawlerson View PostIt seems Con loves bloated and crappy code and that's why he wrote few good things about slowlaris. Furthermore, we can admit Con was kicked out from Linux development and I bet he was too weak. Oracle should hire him, so he will be able to write a code that will crawl like a turtle in real workloads.
That said, I think he is very competent so he must be correct on topic.
Also, remember that "better" is an enemy of "good". So in order to progress one must find weaknessess to be able to combat them.
This is why in this angle criticism is very good. You don't kick out developers for criticism - this way you will end up with a bunch of "agree" types that can't improve anything, because they agree that current state is always good.
Comment
Comment