Unigine Engine Ported To Android Phones, Tablets

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Drago
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 799

    #11
    Originally posted by lexa2 View Post
    That's might be the secret beneath the Unigine success :-) (well, possible future success, as we all hope that this linux-compatible engine would gain a major popularity throughout game development studios). As for weather conditions in Tomsk - this year we've got an anomaly warm winter in Siberia having around -20 Celsius degrees while it is typical to have around -35...-40 at this winter dates (i.e., in the middle of January).
    Holy sh*t! Here we have -20C at most, but it freezes the crap out of me

    Comment

    • glxextxexlg
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2010
      • 205

      #12
      Поздравляю вас Unigine Team! Желаю вам успехи! Спасибо вам за хороший пример модерной игры на линуксе!

      Comment

      • pingufunkybeat
        Senior Member
        • Jun 2009
        • 2921

        #13
        These devices are surely not OpenGL 3 capable, right?

        Does this mean that the engine has OpenGL 2 fallbacks? This would mean that the engine might even run on OSS drivers. This would be a good thing.

        Comment

        • glxextxexlg
          Senior Member
          • Oct 2010
          • 205

          #14
          Does this mean that the engine has OpenGL 2 fallbacks? This would mean that the engine might even run on OSS drivers. This would be a good thing.
          As long as mesa has a working EGL state tracker and OpenGL ES implementation yes. When that happens all the tablet and handheld goodness will be able to play ball with linux.

          Comment

          • pingufunkybeat
            Senior Member
            • Jun 2009
            • 2921

            #15
            Awesome!

            Comment

            • madjr
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 583

              #16
              Unigine and Siberia (yes, with all its unique culture and stereotypes)... ROCK!

              Comment

              • smitty3268
                Senior Member
                • Oct 2008
                • 6966

                #17
                Originally posted by pingufunkybeat View Post
                These devices are surely not OpenGL 3 capable, right?
                They all support OpenGL ES 2.0, which i believe lines up pretty closely with OpenGL 3. It's not clear to me exactly what the differences are. I'm guessing they do support the same patented extensions that are giving Mesa problems with GL3, though.

                Comment

                • bridgman
                  AMD Linux
                  • Oct 2007
                  • 13187

                  #18
                  One of the Khronos documents describes GL ES 2.0 relative to GL 2.0 and most of the changes are "removals", ie GL ES 2.0 is probably best described as a subset of GL 2.0 with a few things added.



                  In general the GL ES 2.0 spec seems to align better with DX9 hardware. Look at section 3.8 (Texturing) re: NPOT textures for a good example.
                  Test signature

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X