Michael must have been pissed that the KWin dev mocked his benchmarks in his blog so he enabled desktop effects in fullscreen and did not unredirect fullscreen.
No everyone will be like ZOMG! KDE suxxx!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ubuntu 13.04 Desktop Gaming Performance Comparison
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by gururise View PostBest idea I've heard yet!! Now why doesn't something like this exist???
Leave a comment:
-
These benchmarks clearly show that performance of games can be influenced by compositing WMs.
So the real question that remains for me is: Why is Michael using Unity when it comes to benchmarks of different driver versions, when it is so obvious that there is a non-predictable influence on performance? Why not use Openbox for those benchmarks instead, which constantly delivers the same good performance?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by gururise View PostI've used Gnome-Shell since its release, and still not sure how to "Unredirect fullscreen", or if there is even an option.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by gururise View PostAgreed. Most Linux users are going to be using default settings.
To those who are complaining about these benchmarks: Do you really think it is realistic for the average user coming from Windows to know how to tweak numerous settings in each Desktop? I've used Gnome-Shell since its release, and still not sure how to "Unredirect fullscreen", or if there is even an option.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by gururise View PostBest idea I've heard yet!! Now why doesn't something like this exist???
- I don?t want game developers to decide if my screen should be composited or not
- game developers don?t want to bother with this
- why ask game devs to code this in each and every game when it can (should) be solved once and for all in the WM?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by talvik View PostI disagree, sticking to the default is the most realistic test. What is 'unredirect fullscreen'?
Every benchmark someone says it's useless because: "Distro Y sucks, distro X wasn't tested", "gcc didn't A,B,C parameters", "kernel ....", "Testing version 3.5.71 is stupid", "Gosh, proper gaming is done with low latency real time kernel."....
Last time I saw a blog post by kwin dev about Phoronix benchmark. He thought the benchmark was useless, because it didn't use kwin with three different drawing back-ends and n other settings. If everyone had their way, each chart would have thousands of items.
To those who are complaining about these benchmarks: Do you really think it is realistic for the average user coming from Windows to know how to tweak numerous settings in each Desktop? I've used Gnome-Shell since its release, and still not sure how to "Unredirect fullscreen", or if there is even an option.
Leave a comment:
-
Would there be any argument as to why Undirect Fullscreen Windows SHOULDN'T be enabled by default in KDE?
I installed Ubuntu 12.04 last week on a machine and went to enable the equivalent functionality in Compiz Settings Manager and noticed the option was already enabled by default, so I wonder if the KDE devs should do the same thing.
If gaming in windowed mode, again I personally just switch off effects. Not like I need a cube or fancy transparency effects while playing a game anyway
Leave a comment:
-
that was odd for me to believe too
Originally posted by Rexilion View PostThat's odd... Maybe because they use something fglrx doesn't support? wow...
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: