Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SDL3 Preview Release Aims To Help Test The New SDL 3.0 API

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by furtadopires View Post
    My dream is for Japanese / Korean developers to know this awesome FOSS project, because I know how awful joystick configuration can be in some of their games ported to PC.
    I highly doubt Japanese developers will use it because they got scared of GPL (e.g. Aquaplus/Leaf/Xvid GPL incident https://leaf.aquaplus.jp/product/xvid.html ). Even through SDL2 and newer are licensed under more permissive Zlib licenses, it seems like there is still some information/memories going around.

    Last edited by uyjulian; 25 March 2024, 12:41 AM.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by uyjulian View Post
      I highly doubt Japanese developers will use it because they got scared of GPL (e.g. Aquaplus/Xvid incident https://leaf.aquaplus.jp/product/xvid.html ). Even through SDL2 and newer are licensed under more permissive licenses, it seems like there is still some information/memories going around.
      Could you tell me more about? Never heard about this incident.

      But that apart, AFAIK all the components of SDL are under Zlib which is a permissive license of "You can use everything but give me some credits will ya".
      I believe the actual problem is that mentality of "just use the default tools available" like western companies do with using Microsoft's Media Foundation (despite the better alternatives available). It's probably a matter of their using once for a successful case, and then realizing it's better to use always.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by furtadopires View Post
        Could you tell me more about? Never heard about this incident.

        But that apart, AFAIK all the components of SDL are under Zlib which is a permissive license of "You can use everything but give me some credits will ya".
        I believe the actual problem is that mentality of "just use the default tools available" like western companies do with using Microsoft's Media Foundation (despite the better alternatives available). It's probably a matter of their using once for a successful case, and then realizing it's better to use always.
        It seems like a large amount of the old message board messages disappeared/not indexable, but here are some references anyways https://www.google.com/search?q=%22l...id%22&ie=UTF-8

        Comment

        Working...
        X