Hm! Something like ffmpeg, but offering a clean API? Or related to wayland? *shrugs*
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
"PulseVideo" Coming To Complement PulseAudio?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by MoonMoon View Post
But it's new, and we all know how gens reacts to new things: they are either stupid and/or he can do better with a few lines of shell script.
i always say that audio should go over shell scripts
i never ever mentioned that it should go over shm, that JACK already does it, that it is the oldest IPC
and i never ever did a benchmark of all this
cuz you know, it doesn't go over shell scripts so its no good
(thats sarcasm, for those who dont know)
PA is at major version 6 already, and it doesn't support shm
im sorry if you think that audio and video should have a dedicated server and send all their data over dbus
im sorry for the education level of your country (dont feel bad, IT education is bad everywhere)Last edited by gens; 30 June 2015, 11:58 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by gens View Post
yes ofc
i always say that audio should go over shell scripts
i never ever mentioned that it should go over shm, that JACK already does it, that it is the oldest IPC
and i never ever did a benchmark of all this
cuz you know, it doesn't go over shell scripts so its no good
Comment
-
Originally posted by Scimmia View PostAll of which has absolutely nothing to do with this news item.
so its a fairly safe guess
edit: also gstreamer still does not do alsa properly, and this is from a gstreamer guy
il publicly apologize here if this turns out to be done correctly
cuz im not one of those that dont admit mistakes
Comment
-
Originally posted by gens View Post
itl most probably be over k/dbus
they don't do anything else anymoreLast edited by duby229; 30 June 2015, 12:03 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by duby229 View Post
Well, if they really do start start shoving video data onto kdbus, they'll be in for a world of surprise. I can see that happening, but it won't take long before they realize those 2-3 context switches every second adds up to thousands of unusable cycles.
with kdbus one could send a lot of data over shm (what they call "zero-copy")
its still overhead from actually doing something like sending a fd to the app that wants it
(idk how webcam capture works in linux, that it is over a socket is an assumption (USB is a network protocol so it makes sense))
plus the relatively small overhead of encapsulating data in the dbus protocol and sending/receiving to a server rather then directly
i care
cuz i like efficiency and i think that there shouldn't be a kernel in userspace where there is a kernel already
but hey, its features
Comment
-
Originally posted by duby229 View PostMaybe they won 't care, but it'll kill multitasking while watching video. At minimum they'll be seriously irked.
itl also introduce some latency and possibly jitter
its funny how some go rlyyy deep just to reduce some jitter and other make tools to help reduce power consumption
then some come and just pile on thatLast edited by gens; 30 June 2015, 12:36 PM.
Comment
Comment