Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

BFQ I/O Scheduler For Linux Sees Big Scalability Improvement

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BFQ I/O Scheduler For Linux Sees Big Scalability Improvement

    Phoronix: BFQ I/O Scheduler For Linux Sees Big Scalability Improvement

    Following the work on enhancing the scalability of the MQ-Deadline I/O scheduler, Linux storage expert Jens Axboe has applied similar scalability improvements to the BFQ I/O scheduler...

    Phoronix, Linux Hardware Reviews, Linux hardware benchmarks, Linux server benchmarks, Linux benchmarking, Desktop Linux, Linux performance, Open Source graphics, Linux How To, Ubuntu benchmarks, Ubuntu hardware, Phoronix Test Suite

  • #2
    This guy is amazing!
    Congratulations and many thanks to him!

    Comment


    • #3
      It's one of those cases that seem too good to be true ... although avg Linux user wouldn't notice prolly.

      Comment


      • #4
        In which Kernel are these improvements (on both MQ-Deadline and BFQ I/O) scheduled?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by MorrisS. View Post
          In which Kernel are these improvements (on both MQ-Deadline and BFQ I/O) scheduled?
          "scheduled"

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by MorrisS. View Post
            In which Kernel are these improvements (on both MQ-Deadline and BFQ I/O) scheduled?
            Keep your eye on https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux...alds/linux.git, if it shows up there before rc1 is cut today it will be in 6.8. But probably, I wouldn't expect it before 6.9.

            Comment


            • #7
              Nice! Now improve Kyber please.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by cl333r View Post
                It's one of those cases that seem too good to be true ... although avg Linux user wouldn't notice prolly.
                I was going to say the same. A home user won't see much of a change, but this is going to work wonders for servers, which, like it or not, is still where Linux is most widespread. All of a sudden, cloud providers are able to serve the same level of IOPS using half the storage for spreading reads/writes around.
                A welcome improvement nonetheless.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by evert_mouw View Post

                  "scheduled"
                  What do you read about "scheduled" word?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by bug77 View Post

                    I was going to say the same. A home user won't see much of a change, but this is going to work wonders for servers, which, like it or not, is still where Linux is most widespread. All of a sudden, cloud providers are able to serve the same level of IOPS using half the storage for spreading reads/writes around.
                    A welcome improvement nonetheless.
                    Tell that to KDE Plasma users where the UI stutters or even freezes for a few seconds when there's heavy storage IO!
                    Maybe these kind of changes help a bit in those cases too.
                    Last edited by Danny3; 21 January 2024, 06:38 PM.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X