Btrfs users don't need an integrity checker much like they don't a reliable RAID 5/6 solution based on Btrfs.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Btrfs Deprecating Its Integrity Checker Tool
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by NotMine999 View PostBtrfs users don't need an integrity checker much like they don't a reliable RAID 5/6 solution based on Btrfs.
Originally posted by EphemeralEft View PostUsually I'd agree with this sentiment, but DM-Integrity is unusably slow. I'd love if BTRFS's algorithm replaced it, though.
Btrfs' integrity checker is nothing more than an internal debugging tool (that has outlived its usefulness). You are not supposed to use it if you are not actively debugging Btrfs code.
- Likes 23
Comment
-
Originally posted by elbar View PostHas Btrfs some foundation to preserve and gain market traction and maybe some adoption among those who could like it and maybe make some progress?
- Likes 8
Comment
-
Originally posted by intelfx View PostYou are not supposed to use it if you are not actively debugging Btrfs code.
(Honestly, I agree; a regular scrub is enough of a precaution. Heck, you can have it run just in the quietest two hours and pause it after that for resuming the day after.)
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ananace View Post
Well, it's the default filesystem for both Fedora and SUSE, it's heavily used at Meta (it's been mentioned as being the exclusive filesystem for their server fleet), it's the root filesystem in every Steam Deck, it's used by distributions like ChimeraOS to distribute new immutable root images, etc.
I would personally feel very good about running my root folder on btrfs single disk read only!
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment