aufs, why won't they mainline that, pretty much every live cd distro uses squashfs...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Six Features Not In The Mainline Linux 5.6 Kernel
Collapse
X
-
Yes! Must get that futex work in! The problem is that most people don't do mutexes right, it's just waaay beyond the scope of what a game engine -should- do and most don't bother. The few engines that do mutexes in user space pretty much exclusively get it wrong.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hax0r View Postaufs, why won't they mainline that, pretty much every live cd distro uses squashfs...
Comment
-
Originally posted by duby229 View PostYes! Must get that futex work in! The problem is that most people don't do mutexes right, it's just waaay beyond the scope of what a game engine -should- do and most don't bother. The few engines that do mutexes in user space pretty much exclusively get it wrong.
Why in the kernel? Who would call the kernel directly? If they "get it wrong" outside the kernel, they will also "get it wrong" inside the kernel. Better outside.
The whole point of the futex APi is to support implementations in user space, to avoid unnecessary kernel calls.Last edited by indepe; 10 February 2020, 04:11 PM.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by Britoid View PostIt's a shame inkernel DBUS has stalled, have been looking forward to it for a long time.
Podman is using varlink too. There is also kernel module for varlink on github, but I think the protocol needs some time to mature to even try mainlining it, if ever
Comment
-
Originally posted by CommunityMember View Post
The aufs code base had been criticized as being "dense, unreadable, uncommented code", and the author gave up trying to mainline it quite some time ago. TTBOMK no one else has stepped up to resolve the various issues in the code base that would make it acceptable for mainline.
Comment
-
Another very important feature missing form 5.6 kernel is network connection over Wifi, which is missing for some high-end motherboards.
Like for example:
Also I'm wondering why only Arch people are talking about this problem even though this clearly exist in Ubuntu kernels too.
Up until Now I see both Arch for version 19 and Ubuntu for version 20.04 are going back to 5.4.
I hope not everybody is solving this problem by avoiding it (using the older kernel).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Danny3 View Post
2. It has nothing to do with the release cycle since patches can and should be written and applied by the maintainers.
Originally posted by Danny3 View PostAlso I'm wondering why only Arch people are talking about this problem even though this clearly exist in Ubuntu kernels too.
Up until Now I see both Arch for version 19 and Ubuntu for version 20.04 are going back to 5.4.
I hope not everybody is solving this problem by avoiding it (using the older kernel).
2. It doesn't affect the older kernels Ubuntu is packaging.
3. People who really need desktop wifi buy a $10 usb dongle at wallmart so what's the rush?
Comment
Comment